An examination of the relationships between student conduct and the number of computers per student in Florida schools

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 98-107

  Barron, Ann E ^a   Hogarty, Kristine Y ^a   Kromrey, Jeffrey D ^a   Lenkway, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Florida Department of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

Computers; Educational technology; Student conduct; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746179246     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1999.10782271     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavior sciences (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
3. Kearsley, G. (1993). Educational technology: Does it worked-Tech Review, 5, 34-36.
4. Knezek, G. A., & Miyashita, K. T. (1993, April). Learner dispositions related to primary school computing in three nations: 1992 Results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC NO. ED 359 215)
5. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
6. Kulik, J. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings in computer-based instruction. In E. L Baker & H. E O’Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Losak, J., & MacFarland, T. (1994).An evaluation of Florida’s Model Technology Schools Program: 1988 to 1993. You can’t go home again (Report 94-02). Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova Southeastern University. (ERIC No. ED 381129)
8. McDaniel, C, Jr., & Davis, A. (1989, March). West Virginia Department of Education: Governor’s summer youth enhancement program. Paper presented at the National Dropout Prevention Conference, Nashville, TN. (ERIC No. ED 317 783)
9. McKinnon, D. H. (1997, March). Longitudinal case study of student attitudes, motivation, and performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational research Association, Chicago. (ERIC No. ED 408 350)
10. Niemiec, R., & Walberg, H.J. (1987). Comparative effects of computer-assisted instruction: A synthesis of reviews. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(1), 19-37.
11. Oppenheimer, T. (1997). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly, 280(1), 45-62.
12. O’Connor, J., & Brie, R. (1994). Mathematics and science partnerships: Products, people, performance and multimedia. The Computing Teacher, 22(1), 27-30.
13. Peck, K. L., & Dorricott, D. (1994). Why use technology? Educational Leadership, 51(7), 11-14.
14. Quality Education Data. (1998). US. school districts to spend $SA billion on technology in 1998-99 [Online document]. Denver, CO: Quality Education Data. Available: Www.qeddata.com/TPFPress%20Release.htm.
15. Trotter, A. (1998). A question of effectiveness. Education Week, 28(5), 6-9.
16. Yang, Y. (1991-1992). The effects of media on motivation and content recall: Comparison of computer and print-based instruction. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 20(2), 95-105.