What is history for? reply to critics of the dawn of analysis

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 645-665

  Soames, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746171294     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-006-0016-2     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Boolos, G. (1975). On second-order logic. The Journal of Philosophy, LXXII(16), 509-528.
2. Cartwright, R. (1987).On the origins of Russell's theory of descriptions. In Philosophical essays. Cambridge: MIT.
3. Moore, G. E. (1925), A defense of common sense. In Contemporary British Philosophy (2nd Series), edited by J. H. Muirhead.
4. Moore, G. E. (1939), Proof of an external world. Proceedings of the British Academy 25.
5. Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Quine, W. V. (1970). Philosophy of logic. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
7. Russell, B. (1903). Principles of mathematics, 2nd ed. New York: Norton, originally published 1903.
8. Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14.
9. Russell, B. (1914). Our knowledge of the external world. London: George Allen and Unwin.
10. Russell, B. (1985). The philosophy of logical atomism. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court. Originally published in 1918.
11. Russell, B. (1993). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. New York: Dover. Originally published in 1919.
12. Sainsbury, M. (1979). Russell. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.