On the importance of history for responsible agency

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 351-382

  Vargas, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746171293     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-004-7819-9     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bennett, J. (1980): 'Accountability', in Z. Van Straaten (ed.), Philosophical Subjects, New York: Clarendon.
2. Bratman, M. (2000): 'Fischer and Ravizza on Moral Responsibility and History', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXI(2), 453-458.
3. Bratman, M. (2002): 'Nozick on Free Will', in Robert Nozick, D. Schmidtz (ed.), New York: Cambridge, pp. 155-174.
4. Churchland, P. (2002): Brainwise, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
5. Clarke, R. (2003): Libertarian Accounts of Free Will, Oxford: Oxford.
6. Dennett, D. (1984): Elbow Room, Cambridge: MIT.
7. Double, R. (1991): The Non-Reality of Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Dworkin, G. (1986): 'Review of Elbow Room', Ethics 96(2), 423-425.
9. Dworkin, G. (1988): The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, New York: Cambridge.
10. Ekstrom, L.W. (2000): Free Will: A Philosophical Study, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
11. Fischer, J.M. (2000a): 'Chicken Soup for the Semi-Compatibilist Soul: Reply to Haji and Kane', Journal of Ethics 4(4), 404-407.
12. Fischer, J.M. (2000b): 'Précis of Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXI(2), 441-446.
13. Fischer, J.M. (2000c): 'Replies', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXI(2), 467-480.
14. Fischer, J.M. (2000d): 'Responsibility, History, and Manipulation', Journal of Ethics 4(4), 385-391.
15. Fischer, J.M. and Ravizza, M. (1994): 'Responsibility and History', in P.A. French, T.E. Uehling Jr. and H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Notre Dame: Notre Dame, pp. 430-451.
16. Fischer, J.M. and Ravizza, M. (1998): Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility, New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Frankfurt, H. (1971): 'Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person', Journal of Philosophy 68(1), 5-20.
18. Frankfurt, H.G. (1988): The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Haji, I. (2000): 'On Responsibility, History, and Taking Responsibility', Journal of Ethics 4(4) 351-356.
20. Huxley, A. (1942): Brave New World, New York: Perennial.
21. Kane, R. (1996): The Significance of Free Will, Oxford: Oxford.
22. Kane, R. (1999): 'Responsibility, Luck, and Chance: Reflections on Free Will and Indeterminism', Journal of Philosophy XCVI(5), 217-240.
23. Kane, R. (2000): 'Non-Constraining Control and the Threat of Social Conditioning', Journal of Ethics 4(4), 357-360.
24. Lewis, D. (1994): 'Humean Supervenience Debugged', Mind 103, 473-490.
25. Lewis, D. (1999): Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Marquis, D. (1989): 'Why Abortion Is Immoral', Journal of Philosophy 86(4), 183-202.
27. McKenna, M. (1998): 'The Limits of Evil and the Role of Moral Address', Journal of Ethics 2(2), 123-142.
28. Mele, A. (1995): Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy, New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Mele, A. (1999): 'Kane, Luck, and the Significance of Free Will', Philosophical Explorations 2, 96-104.
30. O'Connor, T. (2000): Persons and Causes, New York: Oxford.
31. Pereboom, D. (2001): Living without Free Will, Cambridge: Cambridge.
32. Scanion, T.M. (1988): 'The Significance of Choice', in Tanner Lectures.
33. Smart, J.J.C. (1961): 'Free Will, Praise, and Blame', Mind 70 291-306.
34. Smilansky, S. (2000): Free Will and Illusion, New York: Clarendon.
35. Stern, L. (1974): 'Freedom, Blame, and the Moral Community', Journal of Philosophy 71(3), 72-84.
36. Strawson, G. (1994): The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility', Philosophical Studies 75, 5-24.
37. Strawson, P.F. (1962): 'Freedom and Resentment', Proceedings of the British Academy XLVIII, 1-25.
38. Van Inwagen, P. (1983): An Essay on Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Van Inwagen, P. (2000): 'Free Will Remains a Mystery', in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, Boston: Blackwell, pp. 1-20.
40. Vargas, M. (2004): 'Responsibility and the Aims of Theory: Strawson and Revisionism', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85(2), 218-241.
41. Vargas, M. (forthcoming): 'Compatibilism Evolves? On Some Varieties of Dennett Worth Wanting', Metaphilosophy.
42. Vargas, M. (forthcoming): 'The Revisionist's Guide to Responsibility', Philosophical Studies.
43. Vargas, M. (Under review): 'Moral Influence, Moral Responsibility'.
44. Wallace, R.J. (1994): Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Walter, H. (2001): Neurophilosophy of Free Will: From Libertarian Illusions to a Concept of Natural Autonomy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Warfield, T. (2000): 'Causal Determinism and Human Freedom Are Incompatible: A New Argument for Incompatibilism', in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, Boston: Blackwell, pp. 167-180.
47. Watson, G. (1986): 'Review of Elbow Room, The Journal of Philosophy 83(9), 517-522.
48. Watson, G. (1987a): 'Free Action and Free Will', Mind 96, 145-172.
49. Watson, G. (1987b): 'Responsibility and the Limits of Evil', in F.D. Schoeman (ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions, New York: Cambridge, pp. 256-286.
50. Yaffe, G. (2002): 'Recent Work on Addiction and Responsible Agency', Philosophy and Public Affairs 30(2), 178-221.
51. Zimmerman, D. (2002): 'Reasons-Responsiveness and Ownership-of-Agency', Journal of Ethics 6, 199-234.