Knowledge laundering: Testimony and sensitive invariantism

Analysis

Volumn 65, Issue 286, 2005, Pages 132-138

  MacFarlane, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746168431     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00538.x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Audi, R. 1997. The place of testimony in the fabric of justification and knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 405-22
2. Burge, T. 1993. Content preservation. Philosophical Review 102: 457-88
3. Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press
4. Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press
5. Graham, P. J. 2000. Transferring knowledge. Noûs 34: 131-52
6. Harman, G. 1968. Knowledge, inference, and explanation. American Philosophical Quarterly 5: 164-73
7. Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press
8. McDowell, J. 1993. Knowledge by hearsay. In Knowing from Words: Western Understanding and Testimony and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony, ed. B. K. Matilal and A. Chakrabarti, 195-224. Dordrecht: Kluwer
9. McDowell, J. 1998. Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press
10. Ross, A. 1986. Why do we believe what we are told? Ratio 28: 69-88
11. Williamson, T. 1996. Knowing and asserting. Philosophical Review 105 489-523