Minimally invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of the cardiovascular system: Available options and future perspectives

Current Cardiology Reviews

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 37-39

  Romano, Salvatore M ^a   Olivotto, Iacopo ^a   Chiostri, Marco ^a   Giglioli, Cristina ^b   Margheri, Massimo ^b   Gensini, Gian Franco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b CAREGGI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIR); Aortic pressure; Cardiac Cycle Efficiency (CCE); Pulse contour method (PCM); Thermodilution

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ALGORITHM; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CALCULATION; CALIBRATION; CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART CYCLE; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART WORK; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 33746165591     PISSN: 15733947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157340306775515308     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. O'Malley P, Smith B, Hamlin R, Nickel J, Nakayama T, Mac Vicar M, Mann B. A comparison of bolus versus continuous cardiac output in an experimental model of heart failure. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:1985-90.
2. Singh A, Juneja R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Comparison of continuous, stat, and intermittent cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16:186-90.
3. Grossman W. Blood flow measurement: The cardiac output. Cardiac catheterisation and angiography. Grossman W (Ed.). Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1986, 101-17.
4. Fagard R, Conway J. Measurement of cardiac output: Fick principle using catheterisation. Eur Heart J 1990; 11(Suppl 1): 1-5.
5. Gödje O, Hoke K, Lamm P, Schmitz C, Thiel C, Weinert M, Reichart B. Continuos, less invasive, hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care after cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 46:242-49.
6. Jansen JRC, Wesseling KH, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Continuous cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour during cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 1990; 11(Suppl 1): 26-32.
7. Levett JM, Replogle RL. Thermodilution cardiac output: A critical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res 1979; 27: 392-404.
8. Bazaral MG, Petre J, Novoa R. Errors in thermodilution cardiac output measurements caused by rapid pulmonary artery temperature decreases after cardiopulmonary by-pass. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:31-7.
9. Gödje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE, Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Reichart B, Friedl R, Hannekum A, Pfeiffer UJ. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 52-8.
10. Snyder JV, Power DJ. Effects of mechanical ventilation on the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1982; 10: 677-82.
11. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA. Reliability of thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126:1001-4.
12. Elkayam V, Berkely R, Stanley A. Cardiac output by thermodilution technique: effects of injectate volume and temperature on the accuracy and reproducibility in the critically ill patients. Chest 1983; 34:418-22.
13. Ronner RE, Morton MJ, Sakuma GY. Indicator amount, temperature and intrinsic cardiac output effect thermodilution cardiac output accuracy and reproducibility. Crit Care Med 1993; 21:586-97.
14. Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, Chittock DR, Ronco JJ. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and Fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 122:990-7.
15. Burkhoff D, Alexander JJ, Schipke J. Assessment of Windkessel as a model of aortic input impedance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1988; 255:H742-53.
16. Alderman EL, Branzi A, Sanders W, Brown BW, Harrison DC. Evaluation of the pulse-contour method of determining stroke volume in man. Circulation 1972; 46:546-58.
17. Wesseling KH, Jansen JRC, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74:2566-73.
18. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJA. The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J Biomech 1984; 17:425-35.
19. Remmen JJ, Aengevaeren WR, Verheugt FW, et al. Finapres arterial pulse wave analysis with Modelflow is not a reliable non-invasive method for assessment of cardiac output. Clin Sci 2002 Aug;103(2):143-9.
20. Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in human. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1834-41.
21. Romano SM, Lazzeri C, Chiostri M, Gensini GF, Franchi F. Beat to beat analysis of pressure wave morphology for pre-symptomatic detection of orthostatic intolerance head-up tilt. JACC 2004; 44(9):1891-97.
22. Giomarelli P, Scolletta S, Biagioli B. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26:515-520.
23. Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states". Br J Anaesth 2005; 95(2):159-65.
24. Tulli G, Romano SM, Feminò R. Hemodynamic Monitoring of Septic Patients with Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM). A Gullo(Ed), Anaesthesia Pain Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2005, Springer (in press).