The effect of presentation medium of post-event information: Impact of co-witness information

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 575-581

  Itsukushima, Yukio ^a   Nishi, Mariko ^a   Maruyama, Masakazu ^a   Takahashi, Masanobu ^b  

^a NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b University of the Sacred Heart   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; FALSE MEMORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING TEST; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RECALL; SOCIAL LEARNING; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; VIDEOTAPE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; WITNESS; WORD RECOGNITION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 33746149953     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1208     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Betz, A. L., Skowronski, J. J., & Ostrom, T. M. (1996). Shared realities: social influence and stimulus memory. Social Cognition, 14, 113-140.
2. Byrne, M., & Curtis, R. (2000). Designing health communication: testing the explanation for the impact of communication medium on effectiveness. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 189-199.
3. Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., & McEwan, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Washington, DC: References U.S. Department of Justice.
4. Corston, R., & Coleman, A. (1997). Modality of communication and recall of health related information. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 185-194.
5. Furman, A., Benson, I., & Gunter, B. (1989). Memory for television commercials as a function of the channel of communication. Social Behaviour 3, 105-112.
6. Greene, R. L. (1992). Human memory: paradigm and paradoxes. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Hoffman, H. G., Granhag, P., Kwong See, S. T., & Loftus, E. F. (2001). Social influences on reality-monitoring decisions. Memory & Cognition, 29, 394-404.
8. Itsukushima, Y., Maruyama, M., Muroi, M., & Naitoh, K. (2003, July). Colour memory and post-event information. Paper presented at Psychology and Law International, Interdisciplinary Conference, Edinburgh.
9. Lindsay, S. D. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and development (pp. 27-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Loftus, E. F. (1977). Shifting human color memory. Memory & Cognition, 5, 696-699.
11. Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: the creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 100-104.
12. Loftus, E. F., & Ketcham, K. (1991). Witness for the defense: The accused, the witness, and the expert who puts memory on trial. New York: St. Martin's Press.
13. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
14. Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995-1009.
15. Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but innocent: wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 283-293.
16. Roediger, H. L., III, Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365-371.
17. Schneider, D. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1996). Response conformity in recognition testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 481-485.
18. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedure: recommendation for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior 22, 603-647.
19. Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189-202.