Magnetic resonance urography: A pictorial overview

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 79, Issue 943, 2006, Pages 614-626

  Garcia Valtuille R ^a   Garcia Valtuille A I ^b   Abascal, F ^a   Cerezal, L ^a   Arguello M C ^b  

^a Instituto Radiologico Cantabro   (Spain)

^b Clinica Mompia   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUROSEMIDE; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM;

BLADDER CARCINOMA; BLADDER DISEASE; BLADDER STONE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; KIDNEY ANOMALY; KIDNEY HYPOPLASIA; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; URETER DISEASE; URETER OBSTRUCTION; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; UROGRAPHY; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; URINARY DIVERSION; URINARY TRACT; UROLOGIC DISEASES;

EID: 33746141357     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21075982     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G, Bücker A. MR urography: examination techniques and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2001;11:355-72.
2. O'Malley ME, Soto JA, Yucel EK, Hussain S. MR urography: evaluation of a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique in patients with hydronephrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:387-92.
3. Regan F, Bohlman ME, Khazan R, Rodriguez R, Schultze-Haakh H. MR urography using HASTE imaging in the assessment of ureteric obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1115-20.
4. Rohrschneider WK, Haufe S, Wiesel M, Tonshoff B, Wunsch R, Darge K, et al. Functional and morphologic evaluation of congenital urinary tract dilatation by using combined static-dynamic MR urography: findings in kidneys with a single collecting system. Radiology 2002;224:683-94.
5. Nolte-Ernsting C, Bücker A, Adam G, Neuerburg JM, Jung P, Hunter DW, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced excretory MR urography after low-dose diuretic injection: comparison with conventional excretory urography. Radiology 1998;209:147-57.
6. Nolte-Ernsting C, Staatz G, Tacke J, Günther RW. MR urography today. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:191-209.
7. El-Diasty T, Mansour O, Farouk A. Diuretic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography versus intravenous urography for depiction of nondilated urinary tracts. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:135-45.
8. Blandino A, Gaeta M, Minutoli F, Salamone I, Magno C, Scribano E, et al. MR urography of the ureter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1307-14.
9. Girish G, Chooi WK, Morcos SK. Filling defect artefacts in magnetic resonance urography. Eur Radiol 2004;14:145-50.
10. Schubert RA, Göckeritz S, Mentzel HJ, Rzanny R, Schubert J, Kaiser WA. Imaging in ureteral complications of renal transplantation: value of static fluid MR urography. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1152-7.
11. Zielonko J, Studniarek M, Markuszewski M. MR urography of obstructive uropathy: diagnostic value of the method in selected clinical groups. Eur Radiol 2003;13:802-9.