Factors influencing occurrence of passerines in the reed archipelago of Lake Velence (Hungary)

Acta Ornithologica

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-6

  Báldi, András ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Acrocephalus sp.; Habitat scale; Hungary; Lake Velence; Landscape scale; Logistic regression; Passerines

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; LANDSCAPE; NATURE CONSERVATION; PASSERINE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FEJER; HUNGARY; LAKE VELENCEI;

AVES;

EID: 33746133199     PISSN: 00016454     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3161/068.041.0105     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Báldi A. 1999. Microclimate and vegetation edge effects in a reedbed in Hungary. Biodivers. Conserv. 8: 1697-1706.
2. Báldi A. 2004. Area requirements of passerine birds in the reed archipelago of Lake Velence, Hungary. Acta Zool. Hung. 50:1-8.
3. Báldi A., Kisbenedek T. 1999. Species-specific distribution of reed-nesting passerine birds across reed-bed edges: effects of spatial scale and edge type. Acta Zool. Hung. 45: 97-114.
4. Báldi A., Kisbenedek T. 2000. Bird species numbers in an archipelago of reeds at Lake Velence, Hungary. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 9: 451-462.
5. Batáry P., Báldi A. 2004. Evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success. Conserv. Biol. 18: 389-400.
6. Batáry P., Báldi A. 2005. Factors affecting the survival of real and artificial Great Reed Warbler's nests. Biologia 60: 215-219.
7. Böhning-Gaese K., Oberrath R. 2003. Macroecology of habitat choice in long-distance migratory birds. Oecologia 137: 296-303.
8. Bosschieter L., Goedhart P.W. 2005. Gap crossing decisions by reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 20: 455-468.
9. Celada C., Bogliani G. 1993. Breeding bird communities in fragmented wetlands. Boll. Zool. 60: 73-80.
10. Cleary D. F. R., Genner M. J., Boyle T. J. B., Setyawati T., Angraeti C. D., Menken S. B. J. 2005. Associations of bird species richness and community composition with local and landscape-scale environmental factors in Borneo. Landscape Ecol. 20: 989-1001.
11. Cramp S. 1998. The Complete Birds of the Western Palearctic on CD-ROM. Oxford Univ. Press.
12. Csörgo T. 1995. [Birds] (Aves). In: Vásárhelyi T. (ed). [Animal world of reed belt.] Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, pp. 98-105.
13. Drapeau P., Leduc A., Giroux J. F., Savard J. P. L., Bergeron Y., Vickery W. L. 2000. Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests. Ecol. Monogr. 70: 423-444.
14. Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487-515.
15. Fairbairn S. E., Dinsmore J. J. 2001. Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21: 41-47.
16. Foppen R. P. B., Chardon J. P., Liefveld W. 2000. Understanding the role of sink patches in source-sink metapopulations: Reed Warbler in an agricultural landscape. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1881-1892.
17. Graveland J. 1998. Reed die-back, water level management and the decline of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in The Netherlands. Ardea 86: 187-201.
18. Hinsley S. A., Bellamy P. E., Newton I., Sparks T. H. 1995 Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. J. Avian Biol. 26: 94-104.
19. Hoi H. (ed). 2001. The ecology of reed birds. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wien.
20. Hoi H., Winkler H. 1994. Predation on nests - a case of apparent competition. Oecologia 98: 436-440.
21. Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S. L. 2000. Applied logistic regression. Wiley & Sons, New York.
22. Leisler B. 1975. The significance of foot morphology in the habitat separation of Central European Acrocephalus and Locustella species. J. Ornithol. 116: 117-153.
23. Leisler B., Ley H. W., Winkler H. 1989. Habitat, behavior and morphology of Acrocephalus warblers - an integrated analysis. Ornis Scand. 20: 181-186.
24. Mazerolle M. J., Villard M. A. 1999. Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictors of species presence and abundance: A review. Ecoscience 6: 117-124.
25. Melles S., Glenn S., Martin K. 2003. Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: Species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv. Ecol. 7: Art. No. 5.
26. Moskát C., Báldi A. 1999. The importance of edge effect in line transect censuses applied in marshland habitat. Ornis Fennica 76: 33-40.
27. Moskát C., Honza M. 2000. Effect of nest and nest site characteristics on the risk of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Ecography 23: 335-341.
28. Poulin B. 2001. Introduction: Reedbed management and conservation in Europe. In: Fields R., Warren R. J., Okarma H., Sievert P. R. (eds). Wildlife land and people: Priorities for the 21th century. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, pp. 378-381.
29. Poulin B., Lefebvre G., Mauchamp A. 2002. Habitat requirements of passerines and reedbed management in southern France. Biol. Conserv. 107: 315-325.
30. Surmacki A. 2004. Habitat use by Reed Bunting Emberiza schoeniclus in an intensively used farmland in Western Poland. Ornis Fennica 81: 137-143.
31. Surmacki A. 2005. Habitat use by three Acrocephalus warblers in an intensively used farmland area: the influence of breeding patch and its surroundings. J. Ornithol. 146: 160-166.
32. SPSS 1999. SPSS Base 10.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA.
33. Whited D., Galatowitsch S., Tester J. R., Schik K., Lehtinen R., Husveth J. 2000. The importance of local and regional factors in predicting effective conservation planning strategies for wetland bird communities in agricultural and urban landscapes. Landscape & Urban Plann. 49: 49-65.
34. Winter M., Johnson D. H., Shaffer J. A., Donovan T M., Svedarsky W. D. 2006. Patch size and landscape effects on density and nesting success of grassland birds. J. Wildl. Manage. 70: 158-172.