The logical structure of linguistic commitment III Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility

Journal of Philosophical Logic

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 439-464

  Lance, Mark ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brandom; Commitment; Incompatibility; Logic; Relevance logic

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746122769     PISSN: 00223611     EISSN: 15730433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012280814127     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D., Jr.: Entailment, Vol. 1, Princeton Univ. Press, 1975.
2. Avron, A.: The semantics and proof theory of linear logic, Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, April 1987.
3. Brandom, R.: Varieties of understanding, in Rescher (ed.), Reason and Rationality in Science, University of Pittsburgh.
4. Brandom, R.: Inference, expression and induction, Philos. Stud. 54 (1988), 257-285.
5. Brandom, R.: Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment, Harvard Univ. Press, 1994.
6. Girard, J.-Y.: Linear logic, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 50 (1987), 1-102.
7. Goldblatt, R. I.: Semantic analysis of ortho-logic, J. Philos. Logic 3 (1974), 19-35.
8. Lance, M. N.: Two concepts of entailment, J. Philos. Res. XX (1995), 113-137.
9. Lance, M. N.: Quantification, substitution, and conceptual content, Nous 30(4) (1996), 481-507.
10. Lance, M. N. and Kremer, P.: The logical structure of linguistic commitment I: Four systems of non-relevant commitment entailment, J. Philos. Logic 23 (1991), 369-400.
11. Lance, M. N. and Kremer, P.: The Logical structure of linguistic commitment II: Systems of relevant commitment entailment, J. Philos. Logic 25 (1996), 425-449.
12. Priest, G.: Logic of paradoxes, J. Philos. Logic 8(2) (1979), 19-41.
13. Priest, G. and Sylvan R.: Simplified semantics for basic relevant logics, J. Philos. Logic 21(2) (1992) 217-232.
14. Restall, G.: Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals), J. Philos. Logic 24 (1995), 139-160.
15. Restall, G.: A useful substructural logic, Bull. Interest Group in Pure and Appl. Logics (1994), 137-148.
16. Restall, G.: Information flow and relevant logic, in J. Seligman and D. Westerstahl (eds), Logic, Language and Computation: The 1994 Moraga Proceedings, CSLI Press, 1995, pp. 463-477.