Paper or plastic revisited: Let's keep them both - Reply to Broderick and Stone (2006); Tennen, Affleck, Coyne, Larsen, and DeLongis (2006); And Takarangi, Garry, and Loftus (2006)

Psychological Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 123-125

  Bolger, Niall ^a   Shrout, Patrick E ^b   Green, Amie S ^b   Rafaeli, Eshkol ^c   Reis, Harry T ^d  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diary studies; Ecological momentary assessment; Experience sampling method

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746118654     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.123     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Broderick, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Paper and electronic diaries: Too early for conclusions on compliance rates and their effects-Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006). Psychological Methods, 11, 106-111.
2. Delespaul, P. A. E. G. (1992). Technical note: Devices and timesampling procedures. In M. W. de Vries (Ed.), The experience ofpsychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings (pp. 363-373). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Green, A. S., Rafaeli, E., Bolger, N., Shrout, P. E., & Reis, H. T. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11, 87-105.
4. Litt, M. D., Cooney, N. L., & Morse, P. (1998). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with treated alcoholics: Methodological problems and potential solutions. Health Psychology, 17, 48-52.
5. Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 1087-1110.
6. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934-960.
7. Takarangi, M. K. T., Garry, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2006). Dear diary, is plastic better than paper? I can't remember: Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout and Reis (2006). Psychological Methods, 11, 119-122.
8. Tennen, H., Affleck, G., Coyne, J. C., Larsen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (2006). Paper and plastic in daily diary research: Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006). Psychological Methods, 11, 112-118.
9. Weiler, J. M. (2005, April). Comparison of controlled clinical trials of paper versus ePRO or ePRO versus ePRO. Paper presented at the Drug Information Association Symposium, Arlington, VA.
10. Williams, G. C., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 40-50.
11. Williams, G. C., McGregor, H. A., Zeldman, A., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. Health Psychology, 23, 58-66.