Giving learners a real sense of control over adaptivity, even if they are not quite ready for it yet

Advances in Web-Based Education: Personalized Learning Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 93-125

  Czarkowski, Marek ^a   Kay, Judy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746115265     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-690-7.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one on one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.
2. Browne, D., Totterdell, P., & Norman, M. (1990). Adaptive user interfaces. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Bull, S., & Pain, H. (1995). Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me? Inspecting and questioning the Student Model. Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Washington DC (pp. 501-508). AACE.
4. Bull, S., Brna, P., & Dimitrova, V. (Eds.). (2003). Proceedings of Learner Modelling for Reflection Workshop, Volume V of the AIED2003 Supplementary Proceedings (pp. 209-218).
5. Bull, S., Brna, P., & Pain, H. (1995). Extending the scope of the student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5(1), 45-65.
6. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, O., & Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on the World Wide Web. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS-96 (pp. 261-269). Berlin: Springer.
7. Calvi, L., & Cristea, A. (2002, May). Towards generic adaptive systems: Analysis of a case study. In P. De Bra, P. Brusilovsky, & R. Conejo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Malaga, Spain (pp. 79-89). Springer.
8. Cawsey, A. J., Jones, R. B., & Pearson, J. (2000). The evaluation of a personalised health information system for patients with cancer. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research, 10(1), 47-72.
9. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
10. Cristea, A., & Aroyo, L. (2002, May). Adaptive authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia. In P. De Bra, P. Brusilovsky, & R. Conejo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Malaga, Spain (pp. 122-132). Springer.
11. Czarkowski, M., & Kay, J. (2000). Bringing scrutability to adaptive hypertext teaching. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), ITS 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 423-432). Springer.
12. Czarkowski, M., & Kay, J. (2001). Tutor: Support for scrutably personalised documents. Proceedings of ADCS 2001, Australian Document Computing Symposium (pp. 29-36). Retrieved from http://www.ted.cmis.csiro.au/adcs01/
13. Czarkowski, M., & Kay, J. (2002). A scrutable adaptive hypertext. In P. De Bra, P. Brusilovsky, & R. Conejo (Eds.), Proceedings of AH 2002, Adaptive Hypertext 2002 (pp. 384-387). Springer.
14. Czarkowski, M., & Kay, J. (2003). How to give the user a sense of control over the personalization of adaptive hypertext? Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, User Modeling 2003 Session (pp. 121-132). Retrieved from http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/ah2003/proceedings/
15. De Bra, P., & Ruiter, J. P. (2001, October). AHA! Adaptive hypermedia for all. Proceedings of the WebNet Conference (pp. 262-268).
16. De Bra, P., Aqerts, A., Berden, B., de Lange, B., Rousseau B., Santic, T., Smits, D., & Stash, N. (2003). AHA! The Adaptive Hypermedia Architecture. Proceedings of the International Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia 2003, Nottingham, UK (pp. 81-84).
17. Höök, K., Karlgren, J., Waern, A., Dahlbäck, N., Jansson, C. G., Karlgren, K., & Lemaire, B. (1996). A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia. Journal of User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, Special Issue on Adaptive Hypermedia, 6(2-3), 157-184.
18. Jameson, A., & Schwarzkopf, E. (2002). Pros and cons of controllability: An empirical study. P. De Bra, P. Brusilovsky, & R. Conejo (eds), Proceedings of AH'2002, Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (pp. 193-202). Springer.
19. Kay, J. (2001). Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Tenth Anniversary Special Issue, 11(1-2), 111-127. Retrieved from http://umuai.informatik.uni-essen.de/anniversary.html
20. Kobsa, A. (2002). Personalized hypermedia and international privacy. Communications of the ACM Archive, Special Issue: The Adaptive Web, 45(5), 64-67.
21. Maes, P., & Schneiderman, B. (1997). Direct manipulation vs. interface agents: A debate. Interactions, IV(6), 42-61.
22. Morales, R., Pain, H., Bull, S., & Kay, J. (Eds.). (1999). Open, interactive, and other overt approaches to learner modeling. Proceedings of the workshop at AIED 99. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 1070-1079.
23. Nielsen, J. (1994). Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(1-6), 385-397.
24. Rich, E. (1979). User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science, 3, 355-66.
25. Weber, G., & Brusilovsky, P. (2001). ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for Web-based instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Special Issue on Special Issue on Adaptive and Intelligent Web-based Educational Systems, 12(4).