Development and validation of a metallic haunch seismic retrofit solution for existing under-designed RC frame buildings

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 1739-1766

  Pampanin, Stefano ^a   Christopoulos, Constantin ^b   Chen, Te Hsiu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Beam column joints; Existing buildings; Haunch; Seismic retrofit; Shear hinge; Under designed frames

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RETROFITTING; SEISMOLOGY; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS; METALLIC HAUNCH; SEISMIC RETROFIT;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RETROFIT; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

EID: 33746082139     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.600     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aycardi LE, Mander JB, Reinhorn AM. Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed only for gravity loads: experimental performance of subassemblages. ACI Structural Journal 1994; 91(5):552-563.
2. Beres A, Pessiki S, White R, Gergely P. Implications of experimental on the seismic behaviour of gravity load designed RC beam-column connections. Earthquake Spectra 1996; 12(2):185-198.
3. Hakuto S, Park R, Tanaka H. Seismic load tests on interior and exterior beam-column joints with substandard reinforcing details. ACI Structural Journal 2000; 97(1):11-25.
4. Bing Li, Yiming W, Tso-Chien P. Seismic behaviour of non-seismically detailed interior beam-wide column joints - Part I: Experimental results and observed behaviour. ACI Structural Journal 2002; 99(6):791-802.
5. Park R. A summary of results of simulated seismic load tests on reinforced concrete beam-column joints, beams and columns with substandard reinforcing details. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2002; 6(2):1-27.
6. Pampanin S, Calvi GM, Moratti M. Seismic behaviour of RC beam-column joints designed for gravity loads. Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, Paper No. 726, 2002.
7. Calvi GM, Magenes G, Pampanin S. Experimental test on a three storey RC frame designed for gravity only. Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, Paper No. 727, 2002.
8. Sugano S. State of the art in techniques for rehabilitation of buildings. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 2175, 1996.
9. Federation International du Béton. Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures. fib Bulletin 14, Lausanne, 2001.
10. Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R. Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(7):945-968.
11. Pampanin S, Bolognini D, Pavese A. Performance-based seismic retrofit strategy for existing reinforced concrete frame systems using FRP composites. Journal of Composites for Construction (ASCE) 2006; 10(5):34-49. (Invited Paper for Special Issue on 'Recent International Advances in FRP Research and Application in Construction', Guest Editor: R Seracino).
12. Calvi GM, Magenes G, Pampanin S. Beam-column joint damage and collapse: implications and relevance in RC frame assessment. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2002; 6(1):468-479 (Special issue).
13. Pampanin S, Magenes G, Carr A. Modelling of shear hinge mechanism in poorly detailed RC beam-column joints. Proceedings of the FIB Symposium Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions, Athens, Paper No. 171, 2003.
14. Hertanto E. Seismic assessment of pre-1970 reinforced concrete frame buildings. M.S. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2006.
15. Cosenza G, Manfredi G, Verderame G. Seismic assessment of gravity load designed RC frames: critical issues in structural modelling. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2002; 6(1):101-122 (Special issue).
16. Lowes LN, Altoontash A. Modeling reinforced-concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(12):1686-1697.
17. Yu Q-S, Noel S, Uang C-M. Experimental studies on seismic rehabilitation of pre-Northridge steel moment connections: RBS and haunch approach. Report No. SSRP-97/09, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 1997.
18. Gross JL, Engelhardt MD, Uang C-M, Kasai K, Iwankin NR. Modification of Existing Welded Steel Moment Frame Connections for Seismic Resistance. American Institute of Steel Construction, 1999.
19. Christopoulos C, Filiatrault A. Non-invasive passive energy dissipating devices for the retrofit of steel structures. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas - STESSA 2000, Montreal, Canada, 2000; 387-394.
20. Priestley MJN. Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1997; 1(1):157-192.
21. NZS 3101. The Design of Concrete Structures. Standards New Zealand: Wellington, NZ, 2006.
22. Fabbrocino, G, Verderame G, Manfredi G. Experimental behaviour of anchored smooth rebars in old type reinforced concrete buildings. Engineering Structures 2005; 27(10):1575-1585.
23. Chen TH. Development of a low-invasive seismic retrofit solution for under-designed frame systems based on a metallic haunch. M.S. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2006.
24. Pampanin S, Christopoulos C. Non-invasive retrofit of existing RC frames designed for gravity loads only. fib Symposium on Concrete Structure in Seismic Regions, Athens, 2003.