Evaluating mixed-initiative systems: An experimental approach

ICAPS 2006 - Proceedings, Sixteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 172-181

  Cortellessa, Gabriella ^a   Cesta, Amedeo ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; PROBLEM SOLVING; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SCHEDULING; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; USER INTERFACES;

EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; EXPLANATION SERVICES; MIXED-INITIATIVE PLANNING; REAL WORLD DOMAINS;

PLANNING;

EID: 33746074453     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Ai-Chang, M.; Bresina, J.; Charest, L.; Chase, A.; Hsu, J.; Jonsson, A.; Kanefsky, B.; Morris, P.; Rajan, K.; Yglesias, J.; Chafin, B.; Dias, W.; and Maldague, P. 2004. MAPGEN: Mixed-Initiative Planning and Scheduling for the Mars Exploration Rover Mission. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19:8-12.
2. Anderson, D.; Anderson, E.; Lesh, N.; Marks, J.; Mirtich, B.; Ratajczack, D.; and Ryall, K. 2000. Human-guided simple search. In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000), Austin, Texas, USA. AAAI Press, 209-216.
3. Bresina, J. L.; Jónsson, A. K.; Morris, P. H.; and Rajan, K. 2005. Mixed-Initiative Planning in MAPGEN: Capabilities and Shortcomings. In Proceedings of the ICAPS-05 Workshop on Mixed-initiative Planning and Scheduling, Monterey, CA.
4. Burstein, M., and McDermott, D. 1996. Issues in the development of human-computer mixed-initiative planning. In Gorayska, B., and Mey, J., eds., Cognitive Technology. Elsevier. 285-303.
5. Chandrasekaran, B., and Mittal, S. 1999. Deep versus compiled knowledge approaches to diagnostic problem-solving. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 51(2):357-368.
6. Cohen, R.; Allaby, C.; Cumbaa, C.; Fitzgerald, M.; Ho, K.; Hui, B.; Latulipe, C.; Lu, F.; Moussa, N.; Pooley, D.; Qian, A.; and Siddiqi, S. 1998. What is initiative? User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 8(3-4):171-214.
7. Ferguson, G., and Allen, J. F. 1998. TRIPS: An integrated intelligent problem-solving assistant. In Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1998), Madison, Wisconsin, USA. AAAI Press, 567-572.
8. Gilbert, N. 1989. Explanation and dialogue. Knowledge Engineering Review 4(3):205-231.
9. Goodwin, C. J. 2005. Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Gregor, S. 2001. Explanations from knowledge-based systems and cooperative problem solving: an empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54:81-105.
11. Hayes, C. C.; Larson, A. D.; and Ravinder, U. 2005. Weasel: A MIPAS System to Assist in Military Planning. In Proceedings of the ICAPS-05 Workshop on Mixed-initiative Planning and Scheduling, Monterey, CA.
12. Hayes-Roth, F., and Jacobstein, N. 1994. The state of knowledge-based systems. Communications of the ACM 37:27-39.
13. Jones, D. R., and Brown, D. 2002. The division of labor between human and computer in the presence of decision support system advice. Decision Support Systems 33:375-388.
14. Jussien, N., and Ouis, S. 2001. User-friendly explanations for constraint programming. In Proceedings of the ICLP'01 11th Workshop on Logic Programming Environments, Paphos, Cyprus.
15. Kirkpatrick, A.; Dilkina, B.; and Havens, W. 2005. A Framework for Designing and Evaluating Mixed-Initiative Optimization Systems. In Proceedings of the ICAPS-05 Workshop on Mixed-initiative Planning and Scheduling, Monterey, CA.
16. Langer, E. J. 1992. Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition 1:289-305.
17. Mao, J., and Benbasat, I. 1996. Exploring the use of explanations in knowledge-based systems: a process tracing analysis. Working Paper 96-MIS-002. Faculty of Commerce, University of British Columbia, Canada.
18. Myers, L. K.; Jarvis, P. A.; Tyson, W. M.; and Wolverton, M. J. 2003. A mixed-initiative framework for robust plan sketching. In Procedings of the 2003 International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICA PS-03) Trento, Italy.
19. Nass, C., and Moon, Y. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56:81-103.
20. Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Schank, R. C. 1986. Explanation: A first pass. In Kolodner, J. L., and Riesbeck, C. K., eds., Experience, Memory and Reasoning. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 139-165.
22. Smith, S.; Cortellessa, G.; Hildum, D.; and Ohler, C. 2005. Using a scheduling domain ontology to compute user-oriented explanations. In Castillo, L.; Borrajo, D.; Salido, M.; and Oddi, A., eds., Planning, Scheduling, and Constraint Satisfaction: From Theory to Practice. IOS Press.
23. Smith, S. F.; Hildum, D. W.; and Crimm, D. R. 2005. Comirem: An Intelligent Form for Resource Management. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20:16-24.
24. Wallace, R., and Freuder, E. 2001. Explanation for Whom? In Proceedings of the CP-01 Workshop on User-Interaction in Constraint Satisfaction, Paphos, Cyprus.
25. Ye, L. R. 1995. The Value of Explanation in Expert Systems for Auditing: An experimental Investigation. Expert Systems with Applications 9(4):543-556.