Multimodal error correction for continuous handwriting recognition in pen-based user interfaces

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 324-326

  Wang, Xugang ^a   Li, Junfeng ^a   Ao, Xiang ^a   Wang, Gang ^b   Dai, Guozhong ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOFTWARE   (China)

^b ORANGE LABS   (France)

Author keywords

Handwriting Recognition; Multimodal Fusion; Pen based User Interface; Speech Recognition

Indexed keywords

ERROR CORRECTION; GESTURE RECOGNITION; MODAL ANALYSIS; SENSOR DATA FUSION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; USER INTERFACES;

FUSION ALGORITHMS; HANDWRITING RECOGNITION; MULTIMODAL FUSION; PEN-BASED USER INTERFACES;

CHARACTER RECOGNITION;

EID: 33746061260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1111449.1111525     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. M. H. Coen. Multimodal integration a biological view. In Proceedings of 17th International Joint Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence, pages 1417-1424. Seattle, Washington, USA, August 4-10, 2001.
2. C. Frankish, D. Jones and K. Hapeshi. Decline in accuracy of automatic speech recognition as function of time on task: fatigue or voice drift. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(6):797-816, 1992.
3. C. Halverson, D.B. Horn, C. Karat and J. Karat. The beauty of errors: patterns of error correction in desktop speech systems. In Proceedings of INTERACT '99, pages 133-140, IOS Press. Edinburgh, September 1999.
4. M. Johnston and S. Bangalore. Finite-State multimodal parsing and understanding. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics, vol.1, pages 369-375, Association for Computational Linguistics Morristown. Saarbruecken, Germany, 2000.
5. J. Mankoff and G. Abowd. Error correction techniques for handwriting, speech, and other ambiguous or error prone systems. GVU Technical Report Number: GIT-GVU-99-18,1999.
6. J. Mankoff, G. Abowd and S. Hudson. OOPS: a toolkit supporting mediation techniques for resolving ambiguity in recognition-based interfaces. Computers and Graphics, 24: 819-834,2000.
7. S. Oviatt, A. Deangell and K.Kuhn. Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI97, (S. Pemberton, Ed.) pages 415-422,ACM Press. Atlanta, GA, March 22-27, 1997.
8. S. Oviatt. Taming recognition errors with a multimodal interface. Communication of the ACM, 43(9): 45-51, 2000.
9. J.C. Read, S. MacFarlane and C.Casey. Oops! Silly mel Errors in a handwriting recognition based text entry interface for children. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, pages 35-40, ACM Press. Aarhus, Denmark, 2002.
10. B. Suhm, B. Myers and A. Waibel. Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(1):60-98, 2001.
11. J. Sturm and L. Boves. Effective error recovery strategies for multimodal form-filling applications. Speech Communication, 45:289-303, 2005.
12. M. Zajicek and J. Hewitt. An investigation into the use of error recovery dialogues in a user interface management system for speech recognition. In Proceedings of 3rd IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, IFIP INTERACT'90, pages 755-760, North-Holland. Cambridge, UK, August 27-31, 1990.