Toward multi-viewpoint reasoning with OWL ontologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4011 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 259-272

  Stuckenschmidt, Heiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY;

ONTOLOGY; OWL; RELEVANT; SUBSUMPTION;

ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

EID: 33746061204     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11762256_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ahmed Arara and Djamal Benslimane. Towards formal ontologies requirements with multiple perspectives. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, on Flexible Querz Answering Systems, pages 150-160, 2004.
2. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P F. Patel-Schneider. The Description Logic Handbook - Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
3. Catriel Beeri, Alon Y. Levy, and Marie-Christine Rousset. Rewriting queries using views in description logics. In Proceedings of The 16th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages 99-108, 1997.
4. A. Borgida and L. Serafini. Distributed description logics: Assimilating information from peer sources. Journal of Data Semantics, 1:153-184, 2003.
5. Alexander Borgida. On the relative expressiveness of description logics and predicate logics. Artificial Intelligence, 82(1-2):353-367, 1996.
6. P. Bouquet, F. Giunchiglia, F. van Harmelen, L. Serafini, and H. Stuckenschmidt. C-OWL: Contextualizing ontologies. In Second International Semantic Web Conference ISWC'09, volume 2870 of LNCS, pages 164-179. Springer, 2003.
7. Marco Cadoli and Marco Schaerf. Approximation in concept description languages. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 330-341, 1992.
8. A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh, L. Finkelstein, and M. Goedicke. View-points: a framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2:31-57, 1992.
9. F. Giunchiglia and C. Ghidini. Local models semantics, or contextual reasoning = locality + compatibility. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'98), pages 282-289. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.
10. A. Magkanaraki, V. Tannen, V. Christophides, and D. Plexousakis. Viewing the semantic web through rvl lenses. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 1(4):359-375, 2004.
11. N.F. Noy and M.A. Musen. Specifying ontology views by traversal. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Semantic Web (ISWC-2004), 2004.
12. Rami Rifaieh, Ahmed Arara, and Acha-Nabila Benharkat. Muro: A multi-representation ontology as a foundation of enterprise information systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, pages 292-301, 2004.
13. M Schaerf and M Cadoli. Tractable reasoning via approximation. Artificial Intelligence, 74:249-310, 1995.
14. Dmitry Tsarkov, Alexandre Riazanov, Sean Bechhofer, and Ian Horrocks. Using vampire to reason with owl. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference, pages 471-485, 2004.
15. Andre Valente, Thomas Russ, Robert MacGregor, and William Swartout. Building and (re)using an ontology of air campaign planning. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1):27-36, 1999.
16. R. Volz, D. Oberle, and R. Studer. Views for light-weight web ontologies. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing SAC 2003, 2003.