Relevance feedback for structural query expansion

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3977 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 344-357

  Schenkel, Ralf ^a   Theobald, Martin ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; FEEDBACK; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION THEORY; XML;

QUERY EVALUATION; RETRIEVAL QUALITY; STRUCTURAL FEEDBACK; XML QUERIES;

QUERY LANGUAGES;

EID: 33746055363     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11766278_26     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. G. Amati, C. Carpineto, and G. Romano. Merging XML indices. In INEX Workshop 2004, pages 77-81, 2004.
2. A. Balmin et al. A system for keyword proximity search on XML databases. In VLDB 2003, pages 1069-1072, 2003.
3. H. Blanken, T. Grabs, H.-J. Schek, R. Schenkel, and G. Weikum, editors. Intelligent Search on XML Data, volume 2818 of LNCS. Springer, Sept. 2003.
4. C. J. Crouch, A. Mahajan, and A. Bellamkonda. Flexible XML retrieval based on the extended vector model. In INEX 2004 Workshop, pages 149-153, 2004.
5. M. A. Gonçalves, E. A. Fox, A. Krowne, P. Calado, A. H. F. Laender, A. S. da Silva, and B. Ribeiro-Neto. The effectiveness of automatically structured queries in digital libraries. In 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries (JCDL04), pages 98-107, 2004.
6. T. Grust. Accelerating XPath location steps. In SIGMOD 2002, pages 109-120, 2002.
7. L. Guo et al. XRANK: ranked keyword search over XML documents. In SIGMOD 2003. pages 16-27, 2003.
8. L. Hlaoua and M. Boughanem. Towards context and structural relevance feedback in XML retrieval. In Workshop on Open Source Web Information Retrieval (OSWIR), 2005. http://www.emse.fr/OSWIR05/.
9. W. Hsu, M. L. Lee, and X. Wu. Path-augmented keyword search for XML documents. In ICTAI 2004, pages 526-530, 2004.
10. INEX relevance feedback track, http://inex.is.informatik.uni-duisbiorg. de:2004/tracks/rel/.
11. G. Kazai et al. The INEX evaluation initiative. In Blanken et al. [3], pages 279-293.
12. S. Liu, Q. Zou, and W. Chu. Configurable indexing and ranking for XML information retrieval. In SIGIR 2004, pages 88-95, 2004.
13. Y. Mass and M. Mandelbrod. Relevance feedback for XML retrieval. In INEX 2004 Workshop, pages 154-157, 2004.
14. V. Mihajlovic̀ et al. TIJAH at INEX 2004 modeling phrases and relevance feedback. In INEX 2004 Workshop, pages 141-148, 2004.
15. H. Pan, A. Theobald, and R. Schenkel. Query refinement by relevance feedback in an XML retrieval system. In ER 2004, pages 854-855, 2004.
16. G. Ramirez, T. Westerveld, and A. de Vries. Structural features in content oriented xml retrieval. Technical Report INS-E0508, CWI,Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, 2005.
17. G. Ramírez, T. Westerveld, and A. P. de Vries. Structural features in content oriented XML retrieval. In CIKM 2005, 2005.
18. S. Robertson. On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation, 46:359-364, Dec. 1990.
19. S. Robertson and K. Sparck-Jones. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 27:129-146, May-June 1976.
20. J. Rocchio Jr. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In G. Salton, editor, The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, chapter 14, pages 313-323. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1971.
21. I. Ruthven and M. Lalmas. A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(1), 2003.
22. R. Schenkel, A. Theobald, and G. Weikum. Semantic similarity search on semistructured data with the XXL search engine. Information Retrieval, 8(4):521-545, December 2005.
23. R. Schenkel and M. Theobald. Feedback-driven structural query expansion for ranked retrieval of XML data. In 10th International Conference on Extending Database Technologies (EDBT 2006), Munich, Germany, Mar. 2006.
24. R. Schenkel and M. Theobald. Structural feedback for keyword-based XML retrieval. In 28th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2006), London, UK, Apr. 2006.
25. B. Sigurbjörnsson, J. Kamps, and M. de Rijke. The University of Amsterdam at INEX 2004. In INEX 2004 Workshop, pages 104-109, 2004.
26. M. Theobald, R. Schenkel, and G. Weikum. An efficient and versatile query engine for TopX search. In VLDB 2005, pages 625-636, 2005.
27. A. Trotman and B. Sigurbjörnsson. Narrowed Extended XPath I (NEXI). available at http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/postgrads/andrew/2004-4.pdf, 2004.
28. J.-N. Vittaut, B. Piwowarski, and P. Gallinari. An algebra for structured queries in bayesian networks. In INEX Workshop 2004, Pages 58-64, 2004.
29. R. Weber. Using relevance feedback in XML retrieval. In Blanken et al. [3], pages 133-143.
30. Y. Xu and Y. Papakonstantinou. Efficient keyword search for smallest LCAs in XML databases. In SIGMOD 2005, pages 537-538, 2005.