Flexible spoken dialogue system based on user models and dynamic generation of voiceXML scripts

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2003 Workshop - 4th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Komatani, Kazunori ^a   Adachi, Fumihiro ^a   Ueno, Shinichi ^a   Kawahara, Tatsuya ^a   Okuno, Hiroshi G ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cooperative responses; Dialogue strategy; Spoken dialogue system; User model; VoiceXML

Indexed keywords

SPEECH PROCESSING;

COOPERATIVE RESPONSE; DIALOGUE STRATEGY; DYNAMIC GENERATION; MODEL GENERATION; NATURAL LANGUAGES; NATURAL-LANGUAGE DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; USER DYNAMICS; USER MODELLING; VOICEXML;

DECISION TREES;

EID: 33746053074     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Jennifer Chu-Carroll. 2000. MIMIC: An adaptive mixed initiative spoken dialogue system for information queries. In Proc. of the 6th Conf. on applied Natural Language Processing, pages 97-104.
2. Wieland Eckert, Esther Levin, and Roberto Pieraccini. 1997. User modeling for spoken dialogue system evaluation. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, pages 80-87.
3. Stephanie Elzer, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, and Sandra Carberry. 2000. Recognizing and utilizing user preferences in collaborative consultation dialogues. In Proc. of the 4th Int'l Conf. on User Modeling, pages 19-24.
4. Timothy J. Hazen, Theresa Burianek, Joseph Polifroni, and Stephanie Seneff. 2000. Integrating recognition confidence scoring with language understanding and dialogue modeling. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP).
5. Robert Kass and Tim Finin. 1988. Modeling the user in natural language systems. Computational Linguistics, 14(3):5-22.
6. Kazunori Komatani and Tatsuya Kawahara. 2000. Flexible mixed-initiative dialogue management using concept-level confidence measures of speech recognizer output. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 467-473.
7. Lori Lamel, Sophie Rosset, Jean-Luc Gauvain, and Samir Bennacef. 1999. The LIMSI ARISE system for train travel information. In IEEE Int'l Conf. Acoust., Speech & Signal Processing (ICASSP).
8. Diane J. Litman and Shimei Pan. 2000. Predicting and adapting to poor speech recognition in a spoken dialogue system. In Proc. of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI2000).
9. Eric Nyberg, Teruko Mitamura, Paul Placeway, Michael Duggan, and Nobuo Hataoka. 2002. Dialogxml: Extending voicexml for dynamic dialog management. In Proc. of Human Language Technology 2002 (HLT2002), pages 286-291.
10. Paul Over. 1999. Trec-7 interactive track report. In Proc. of the 7th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC7).
11. Andrew Pargellis, Jeff Kuo, and Chin-Hui Lee. 1999. Automatic dialogue generator creates user defined applications. In Proc. European Conf. Speech Commun. & Tech. (EUROSPEECH).
12. Cecile L. Paris. 1988. Tailoring object descriptions to a user's level of expertise. Computational Linguistics, 14(3):64-78.
13. J. Ross Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. http://www.rulequest.com/see5-info.html.
14. David Sadek. 1999. Design considerations on dialogue systems: From theory to technology -the case of artimis-. In Proc. ESCA workshop on Interactive Dialogue in Multi-Modal Systems.
15. Peter van Beek. 1987. A model for generating better explanations. In Proc. of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-87), pages 215-220.