Continuing Education Needs of Registered Dietitians Regarding Nutrigenomics

Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Volumn 106, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1242-1245

  Rosen, Renee ^a   Earthman, Carrie ^a   Marquart, Len ^a   Reicks, Marla ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIETETICS; EDUCATION; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NUTRITION; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; DIETETICS; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; GENOMICS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746041839     PISSN: 00028223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arab L. Individualized nutritional recommendations. Do we have the measurements needed to assess risk and make dietary recommendations?. Proc Nutr Soc. 63 (2004) 167-172
2. Darnton-Hill I., Margetts B., and Deckelbaum R. Public health nutrition and genetics. Implications for nutrition policy and promotion. Proc Nutr Soc 63 (2004) 173-185
3. Chadwick R. Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health. Proc Nutr Soc 63 (2004) 161-166
4. Kaput J. Diet-disease gene interactions. Nutrition 20 (2004) 26-31
5. Debusk R.M., Fogarty C.P., Ordovas J.M., and Kornman K.S. Nutritional genomics in practice. Where do we begin?. J Am Diet Assoc 105 (2005) 589-598
6. Gillies P.J. Nutrigenomics. The rubicon of molecular nutrition. J Am Diet Assoc. 103 suppl 2 (2003) S50-S55
7. International Food Information Council Foundation. Functional Foods: Attitudinal Research. Available at: http://www.ific.org/research/funcfoodsres02.cfm. Accessed January 4, 2005.
8. Heffernan J.W., and Hillers V.N. Attitudes of consumers living in Washington regarding food biotechnology. J Am Diet Assoc 102 (2002) 85-88
9. Cain M., and Schmid G. From Nutrigenomic Science to Personalized Nutrition. The Market in 2010 (2003), Institute for the Future, Palo Alto, CA SR-793
10. Patterson R.E., Eaton D.L., and Potter J.D. The genetic revolution. Change and challenge for the dietetics profession. J Am Diet Assoc 99 (1999) 1412-1420
11. Commission on Accreditation for Dietetics Education. CADE Accreditation Handbook (2002), American Dietetic Association, Chicago, IL
12. Vickery C.E., and Cotugna N. Incorporating human genetics into dietetic curricula remains a challenge. J Am Diet Assoc 105 (2005) 583-588
13. Gilbride J.A., and Camp K. Preparation and needs for genetics education in dietetics. Top Clin Nutr 19 (2004) 316-323
14. Nunnally J.C., and Bernstein I.H. Psychometric Theory (1994), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
15. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method (2000), John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY
16. Rogers D. Report on the ADA 2002 dietetics compensation and benefits survey. J Am Diet Assoc 103 (2003) 243-255
17. Biesemeier C., and Chima C.S. Computerized patient record. Are we prepared for our future practice?. J Am Diet Assoc 97 (1997) 1099-1104
18. Gilmore C.J., O'Sullivan Maillet J., and Mitchell B.E. Determining educational preparation based on job competencies of entry-level dietetics practitioners. J Am Diet Assoc. 97 (1997) 306-316