Distinguishing treatment from research: A functional approach

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 424-429

  Lewens, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; MORALITY; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PLANNING; RESEARCH ETHICS; THERAPY;

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GOALS; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; MOTIVATION; PHILOSOPHY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; TERMINOLOGY; THERAPEUTICS;

EID: 33746041073     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013078     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Miller F, Brody H. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Cent Rep 2003;33:19-28.
2. Weijer C, Miller P. Therapeutic obligation in clinical research. Hastings Cent Rep 2003;33:3.
3. Applebaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 1987;17:20-4.
4. Levine R. Ethics and regulation of clinical research. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.
5. Sober E. The philosophy of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
6. Bratman M. Intentions, plans and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
7. Freedman B, Fuks A, Weijer C. Demarcating research and treatment: a systematic approach for the analysis of the ethics of clinical research. Clin Res 1992;40:653-60.
8. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. The environmental effects of civil aircraft in flight. London: Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 2002.
9. Ashcroft R. Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice. Bioethics 1999;13:314-26.
10. Weijer C, Miller P. When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? Nat Med 2004;10:570-3.