Comparison of capacitive versus resistive joint contact stress sensors

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 447, Issue , 2006, Pages 214-220

  Martinelli, L ^a   Hurschler, C ^b   Rosenbaum, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOSENSOR; ERROR; JOINT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS; WEIGHT BEARING; ANKLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRANSDUCER;

ANKLE JOINT; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TRANSDUCERS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33746039363     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218730.59838.6a     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bertsch C, Rosenbaum D, Claes L. Intra-articular and plantar pressure distribution of the ankle joint complex in relation to foot position. Unfallchirurg. 2001;104:426-433.
2. Brown TD, Rudert MJ, Grosland NM. New methods for assessing cartilage contact stress after articular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:52-58.
3. Harris ML, Morberg P, Bruce WJ, Walsh WR. An improved method for measuring tibiofemoral contact areas in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of K-scan sensor and Fuji film. J Biomech. 1999;32:951-958.
4. Kernozek TW, LaMott EE, Dancisak MJ. The reliability of an inshoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:204-207.
5. Luo ZP, Berglund LJ, An KN. Validation of F-scan pressure sensor system: a technical note. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998;35:186-191.
6. MacKenzie JR, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Brown TD. Areas of contact and extent of gaps with implantation of oversized acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:127-136.
7. Nuber GW. Biomechanics of the foot and ankle during gait. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1989;6:615-627.
8. Otto JK, Brown TD, Callaghan JJ. Static and dynamic response of a multiplexed-array piezoresistive contact sensor. Experimental Mechanics. 1999;39:317-323.
9. Procter P, Paul JP. Ankle joint biomechanics. J Biomech. 1982;15:627-634.
10. Rosenbaum D, Bertsch C, Claes L. Tenodeses do not fully restore ankle joint loading characteristics: a biomechanical in vitro investigation in the hind foot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12:202-209.
11. Rosenbaum D, Eils E, Hillmann A. Changes in talocrural joint contact stress characteristics after simulated rotationplasty. J Biomech. 2003;36:81-86.
12. Sammarco GJ, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. Biomechanics of the ankle joint. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;4:75-96.
13. von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Witte H, Steinlechner M, Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Eckstein F. Quantitative determination of pressure distribution in the hip joint during the gait cycle. Unfallchirurg. 1999;102:625-631.
14. Wasielewski RC, Galat DD, Komistek RD. Correlation of compartment pressure data from an intraoperative sensing device with postoperative fluoroscopic kinematic results in TKA patients. J Biomech. 2005;38:333-339.
15. Wilson DR, Apreleva MV, Eichler MJ, Harrold FR. Accuracy and repeatability of a pressure measurement system in the patellofemoral joint. J Biomech. 2003;36:1909-1915.