Bringing users and planning technology together. Experiences in SIADEX

ICAPS 2006 - Proceedings, Sixteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 11-20

  Fdez Olivares, Juan ^a   Castillo, Luis ^a   García Pérez, Óscar ^a   Palao, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SCHEDULING; USER INTERFACES;

AUTOMATED PLANNING; INTELLIGENT PLANNING; INTERVENTION PLANNING; SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 33746033762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Avesani, P.; Perini, A.; and Ricci, F. 2000. Interactive case-based planning for forest fire management. Applied Intelligence 13(1):41-57.
2. Avesani, P.; Perinni, A.; and Ricci, F. 1997. CBET: a case-based exploration tool. In Fifth Congress of the Italian Association for A.I.
3. Bienkowski, M. 1995. Demonstrating the Operational Feasibility of New Technologies: The ARPI IFDs. IEEE Expert 10(1):27-33.
4. Biundo, S., and Schattenberg, B. 2001. From abstract crisis to concrete relief - a preliminary report on combining state abstraction and htn planning. In 6th European Conference on Planning (ECP-01).
5. Bresina, J. L.; Jonsson, A. K.; Morris, P.; and Rajan, K. 2005. Activity planning for the mars exploration rovers. In Proceedings of the ICAPS05, 40-49.
6. Castillo, L.; Fernández-Olivares, J.; García-Pérez, O.; and Palao, F. 2006. Efficiently handling temporal knowledge in an HTN planner. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS06).
7. Cohen, P.; Greenberg, M.; Hart, D.; and Howe, A. 1989. Trial by fire: understanding the design requirements for agents in complex environments. AI Magazine 10(3):32-48.
8. de la Asunción, M.; Castillo, L.; Fdez-Olivares, J.; García-Pérez, O.; Gonzalez, A.; and Palao, F. 2004. Handling fuzzy temporal constraints in a planning framework. To appear in the special issue of Annals of Operations Research on Personnel Scheduling and Planning.
9. Edelkamp, S., and Hoffmann, J. 2004. The language for the 2004 international planning competition. http://ls5-www.cs.uni-dortmund.de/edelkamp/ ipc-4/pddl.html.
10. Erol, K.; Hendler, J.; and Nau, D. 1994. UMCP: A sound and complete procedure for hierarchical task-network planning. In AIPS-94.
11. ESRI. 2005. Arc view gis software http://www.esri.com.
12. Long, D., and Fox, M. 2003. The 3rd international planning competition: Results and analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20:1-59.
13. Nau, D.; Au, T.; Ilghami, O.; Kuter, U.; Murdock, J. W.; Wu, D.; and Yaman, F. 2003. SHOP2: An HTN Planning System. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20:379-404.
14. Nau, D.; AU, T.;-Ilghami, O.; Kuter, U.; Wu, D.; and Yaman, F. 2005. Applications of shop and shop2. IEEE Inteligent Systems 34-41.
15. OWL-S, T. 2003. Owl-s:semantic markup for web services, technical white paper (owl-s version 1.0). Technical report, http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/ 1.0/owl-s.html.
16. Protégé. 2006. Stanford medical informatics. http://protege.stanford.edu/.
17. Ruml, W.; Do, M. B.; and Fromherz, M. 2005. On-line planning and scheduling for high-speed manufacturing. In Proceedings of the ICAPS05, 2-11.
18. Siebra, C. 2005. Planning requirements for hierarchical coalitions in disaster relief domains. Expert Update 8(1):20-24.