Electrophysiological correlates of similarity-based interference during detection of visual forms

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 880-888

  Conci, Markus ^a   Gramann, Klaus ^a   Müller, Hermann J ^a   Elliott, Mark A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33745997005     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.880     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & Elliott, M. A. (Submitted). The contrasting impact of global and local object attributes on Kanizsa figure detection.
2. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1994). Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system. Nature, 371, 291-293.
3. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
4. Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225-234.
5. Ffytche, D. H., & Zeki, S. (1996). Brain activity related to the perception of illusory contours. Neuroimage, 3, 104-108.
6. Fitts P. M., & Seeger C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
7. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
8. Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures and neon colour spreading. Psychological Review, 92, 173-211.
9. Gurnsey, R., Humphrey, G. K., & Kapitan, P. (1992). Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 263-276.
10. Gurnsey, R., Poirier, F. J. A. M., & Gascon, E. (1996). There is no evidence that Kanizsa-type subjective contours can be detected in parallel. Perception, 25, 861-874.
11. Halgren, E., Mendola, J., Chong, C. D. R., & Dale, A. M. (2003). Cortical activation to illusory shapes as measured with magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage, 18, 1001-1009.
12. Hirsch, J., de la Paz, R. L., Relkin, N. R., Victor, J., Kim, K., Li, T., Borden, P., Rubin, N., & Shapley, R. (1995). Illusory contours activate specific regions in human visual cortex: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 92, 6469-6473.
13. Hopf, J. M., Boelmans, K., Schoenfeld, M. A., Luck, S. J., & Heinze, H. J. (2004). Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: Evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1822-1832.
14. Hopf, J. M., Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., Hagner, T., Mangun, G. R., Scheich, H., & Heinze, H. J. (2000). Neural sources of focussed attention in visual search. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1233-1241.
15. Kanizsa, G. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea. Rivista di Psycologia, 49, 7-30.
16. Lee, T. S., & Nguyen, M. (2001). Dynamics of contour formation in the early visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 98, 1907-1911.
17. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994a). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291-308.
18. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994b). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000-1024.
19. Murray, M. M., Foxe, D. M., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Setting boundaries: Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6898-6903.
20. Murray, M. M., Wylie, G. R., Higgins, B. A., Javitt, D. C., Schroeder, C. E., & Foxe, J. J. (2002). The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: Combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 5055-5073.
21. Pegna, A. J., Khateb, A., Murray, M. M., Landis, T., & Michel, C. M. (2002). Neural processing of illusory and real contours revealed by high-density ERP mapping. NeuroReport, 13, 965-968.
22. Peterhans, E., & von der Heydt, R. (1991). Subjective contours - Bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology. Trends in Neuroscience, 14, 112-119.
23. Ramachandran, V. S. (1987). Visual perception of surfaces: A biological theory. In S. Petry & G. E. Meyer (Eds.), The perception of illusory contours (pp. 93-108). New York: Springer.
24. Ritzl, A., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., Zafiris, O., Shah, N. J., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2003). Functional anatomy and differential time courses of neural processing for explicit, inferred, and illusory contours. An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 19, 1567-1577.
25. Rubin, N., Nakayama, K., & Shapley, R. (1996). Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields. Science, 271, 651-653.
26. Stanley, D. A., & Rubin, N. (2003). fMRI Activation in response to illusory contours and salient regions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron, 37, 323-331.
27. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
28. von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., & Baumgartner, G. (1984). Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science, 224, 1260-1262.