Installation effects of a bored pile wall in overconsolidated clay

Geotechnique

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 411-425

  Richards, D J ^a   Clark, J ^a   Powrie, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diaphragm and in situ walls; Field instrumentation

Indexed keywords

CLAY; INSTALLATION; PROCESS CONTROL; STRESS ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL LOADS;

DIAPHRAGM AND IN SITU WALLS; FIELD INSTRUMENTATION; HORIZONTAL STRESSES;

PILES;

CLAY; INSTALLATION; PILE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRESS ANALYSIS;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; KENT; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33745971802     PISSN: 00168505     EISSN: 00168505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/geot.2006.56.6.411     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Carder, D. R. & Darley, P. (1998). The long term performance of embedded retaining walls, TRL Report 381. Crowthorne: Transport Research Laboratory.
2. Clark, J., Richards, D. J. & Powrie, W. (2004). Wall installation effects: preliminary findings from a field study at the CTRL, Ashford. Proceedings of the Skempton Memorial Conference, 2, 691-699. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
3. Clayton, C. R. I. & Bica, A. V. D. (1993). The design of diaphragm-type boundary total stress cells. Géotechnique 43, No. 4, 523-535.
4. Fjaer, E., Holt, R. M., Horsrud, P., Raaer, R. M. & Risnes, R. (1992). Petroleum related rock mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Fourie, A. B. & Potts, D. M. (1989). Comparison of finite element and limiting equilibrium analyses for an embedded cantilever retaining wall. Géotechnique 39, No. 2, 175-188.
6. Gaba, A. R., Simpson, B., Powrie, W. & Beadman, D.R. (2003). Embedded retaining walls, guidance for economic design, CIRIA Report C580. London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association.
7. Gallois, R. W. (1965). British regional geology: The Wealden District, 4th edn. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
8. Gibson, R. E. & Anderson, W. F. (1961). In situ measurement of soil properties with the pressuremeter. Civ, Engng Pub. Works Rev. 56, No. 658, 615-618.
9. Gourvenec, S. M. & Powrie, W. (1999). Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of diaphragm wall installation Géotechnique 49, No. 6, 801-823.
10. Gunn, M. J., Satkunananthan, A. & Clayton, C. R. I. (1993). Finite element modelling of installation effects. In Retaining structures (ed. C. R. I. Clayton). London: Thomas Telford, 16-55.
11. Ng, C. W. W. & Yan, R. W. M. (1999). Three-dimensional modelling of a diaphragm wall construction sequence. Géotechnique 49, No. 6, 825-834.
12. Ng, C. W. W., Lings, M. L., Simpson, B. & Nash, D. F. T. (1995). An approximate analysis of the three-dimensional effects of diaphragm wall installation. Géotechnique 45, No. 3, 497-507.
13. Peattie, K. R. & Sparrow, R. W. (1954). The fundamental action of earth pressure cells J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2, 141-155.
14. Potts, D. M. & Fourie, A. B. (1984). The behaviour of a propped retaining wall: results of a numerical experiment. Géotechnique 34, No. 3, 383-404.
15. Potts, D. M. & Fourie, A. B. (1985). The effect of wall stiffness on the behaviour of a propped retaining wall. Géotechnique 35, No. 3, 347-352.
16. Powrie, W. & Kantartzi, C. (1996). Ground response during diaphragm wall installation in clay: centrifuge model tests. Géotechnique 46, No. 4, 725-739.
17. Powrie, W., & Li, E. S. (1991). Finite element analyses of an in situ wall propped at formation level. Géotechnique 41, No. 4, 499-514.
18. Powrie, W., Pantelidou, H. & Stallebrass, S. E. (1998). Soil stiffness in stress paths relevant to diaphragm walls in clay. Géotechnique 48, No. 4, 483-494.
19. Richards, D. J., Clark, J., Powrie, W. & Heymann, Q. (2006). An evaluation of total horizontal stress measurements using push-in pressure cells in an overconsolidated clay deposit. Proc. Instn Civ. Engrs Geotech. Engng, forthcoming.
20. Roscoe, H. (2003). Retaining wall movements, CTRL Contract 430: Ashford Tunnels. Proceedings of the BGA international conference on foundations, Dundee, 757-766.
21. Roscoe, H. & Twine, D. (2001). Design collaboration speeds Ashford tunnels. World Tunnelling, 14, No. 5, 237-241.
22. Ryley, M. D. & Carder, D. R. (1995). The performance of push-in spade cells installed in stiff clay. Géotechnique 45, No. 3, 533-539.
23. Skempton, A. W. & Weeks, A. G. (1976). The Quaternary history of the Lower Greensand escarpment and Weald Clay vale near Sevenoaks, Kent. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London Sci: A 283, 493-526.
24. Smart, J. G. O., Bisson, G. & Worssam, B. C. (1966). Geology of the country around Canterbury and Folkestone. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
25. Stroud, M. A. (1974). The standard penetration test in insensitive clays and soft rocks. Proc. Eur. Symp. on Penetration Testing (ESOPTI), Stockholm 2:2, 367-375.
26. Stroud, M. A. & Sweeney, D. J. (1977). Discussion appendix. In A review of diaphragm walls, pp. 142-148. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
27. Symons, I. F. & Carder, D. R. (1993). Stress changes in stiff clay caused by the installation of embedded retaining walls. In Retaining structures (ed. C. R. I. Clayton). London: Thomas Telford, 227-236.
28. Tedd, P. & Charles, J. A. (1981). In situ measurement of horizontal stress in overconsolidated clay using push-in spade-shaped pressure cells. Géotechnique 31, No. 4, 534-538.
29. Tedd, P. & Charles, J. A. (1983). Evaluation of push-in pressure cell results in stiff clay. Proceedings of the international symposium on soil and rock investigation by in situ testing, Paris, Vol. 2, pp. 579-584.
30. Tedd, P., Chard, B. M., Charles, J. A. & Symons, I. F. (1984). Behaviour of a propped embedded retaining wall in stiff clay at Bell Common. Géotechnique 34, No. 4, 513-532.