Further improvement of temporal resolution of seismic data by autoregressive (AR) spectral extrapolation

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 324-336

  Karsli, Hakan ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Autoregressive spectral extrapolation; Resolution improvement; Wiener deconvolution

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; EXTRAPOLATION; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION; ULTRASONICS;

AUTOREGRESSIVE SPECTRAL EXTRAPOLATION; RESOLUTION IMPROVEMENT; SEISMIC DATA; WEINER DECONVOLUTION; WEINER FILTERING;

SEISMOLOGY;

DECONVOLUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DATA; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

EID: 33745966430     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berkhout A.J. Seismic Resolution: A Quantitative Analysis of Resolving Power of Acoustical Echo Techniques (1984), Geophysical Press Ltd, London
2. Bickel S.H., and Martinez D.R. Resolution performance of Wiener filters. Geophysics 48 (1983) 887-899
3. Burg, J.P., 1975. Maximum entropy spectral analysis. PhD Thesis, Stanford Univ.
4. Claerbout J.F. Fundamentals of Geophysics Data Processing (1976), McGraw-Hill Inc., NewYork
5. Cooke D.A., and Schneider W.A. Generalized linear inversion of reflection seismic data. Geophysics 48 (1983) 665-676
6. Doǧan O., and Erer I. High resolution radar imaging using GPOF based data extrapolation. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS '04, Proceedings (2004) 4470-4473
7. Honarvar F., Sheikhzadeh H., Moles M., and Sinclair A.N. Improving the time-resolution and signal-noise ratio of ultrasonic NDE signals. Ultrasonics 41 (2004) 755-763
8. Jurkevics A., and Wiggins R. A critique of seismic deconvolution methods. Geophysics 49 (1984) 2109-2116
9. Karsli{dotless} H., and Bayrak Y. Using the Wiener-Levinson algorithm to suppress ground-roll. Journal of Applied Geophysics 55 (2004) 187-197
10. Kay S.M. Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application (1988), Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs
11. Kay S.M., and Marple S.L. Spectrum analysis-a modern perspective. Proceedings of IEEE 69 (1981) 1380-1419
12. Kim K.T., Bae J.H., Seo D.K., and Kim H.T. Study of the experimental performance of AR based data extrapolation algorithms for high resolution radar imaging. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 31 (2001) 151-156 (Oct. 20, 2001)
13. Kim K.T., Bae J.H., Seo D.K., and Kim H.T. Effect of AR model based data extrapolation on target recognition performance. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 51 (2003) 912-914
14. Levy S., and Fullagar P.K. Reconstruction of sparse spike train from a portion of its spectrum and application to high resolution deconvolution. Geophysics 46 (1981) 1235-1243
15. Lindseth R.O. Synthetic sonic logs-a process for stratigraphic interpretation. Geophysics 44 (1979) 3-26
16. Lines L.R., and Clayton R.W. A new approach to Vibroseis deconvolution. Geophysical Prospecting 25 (1977) 417-433
17. Miyashita T., Schwelick H., and Kessel W. Recovery of ultrasonic impulse response by spectral extrapolation. Acoustic Imaging 14 (1985)
18. Moore T.G., Zuerndorfer B.W., and Burt E.C. Enhanced imagery using spectral-estimation based techniques. Journal of Lincoln Laboratory 10 (1997) 171-186
19. Neal S.P., Speckman P.L., and Enright M.A. Flaw signature estimation in ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation using the Wiener Filter with limited prior information. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonic Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 40 (1993) 347-352
20. Neal S.P., and Thompson D.O. The Effects of Prior Flaw Information on Wiener Filter Based Ultrasonic Scattering Amplitude Estimation. in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation vol. 7A (1988) 857-864
21. Oldenburg D.W., Levy S., and Whittall K.P. Wavelet estimation and deconvolution. Geophysics 46 (1981) 1528-1542
22. Oldenburg D.W., Scheuer T., and Levy S. Recovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms. Geophysics 48 (1983) 1318-1337
23. Robinson E.A., and Treitel S. Geophysical Signal Analysis (1980), Prentice-Hall, NewYork
24. Saggaf M.M., and Toksöz M.N. An analysis of deconvolution: modeling reflectivity by fractionally integrated noise. Geophysics 64 (1999) 1093-1107
25. Sin A.K., and Chen C.H. A comparison of deconvolution techniques for the ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation of materials. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1 (1992) 3-10
26. Thompson R.B., and Gray T.A. Range of Applicability of Inversion Algorithms. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation vol. 1 (1982) 233-249
27. Walker C., and Ulrych T.J. Autoregressive modeling of the acoustic impedance. Geophysics 48 (1983) 1338-1350
28. Wiener, N., 1949. Extrapolation, interpretation, and smoothing of stationary time series with engineering application. M.I.T. Press and Jhon Wiley and Sons.
29. Yi{dotless}lmaz O. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data (2001), Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, USA
30. Zala C.A. High resolution inversion of ultrasonic traces. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonic Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 39 (1992) 458-463
31. Zala C.A., Barrodale I., and McRae K. High resolution deconvolution of ultrasonic traces. Nato ASI SeriesSignal Processing and Pattern Recognition 1 (1988) 101-108