Simplifying the delivery of a prevention program with web-based enhancements

Journal of Primary Prevention

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 433-444

  Bishop, Dana ^a   Bryant, Kelvin S ^a   Giles, Steven M ^a   Hansen, William B ^a   Dusenbury, Linda ^a  

^a Tanglewood Research Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherence; Fidelity; Internet; Program implementation; School based prevention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; MALE; PILOT STUDY; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; TEACHER;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER USER TRAINING; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIFE STYLE; PILOT PROJECTS; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TEACHING;

EID: 33745965833     PISSN: 0278095X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10935-006-0042-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abbott, R. D., O'Donnell, I., Hawkins, D., Hill, K. G., Kosterman, R., & Catalano, R. F. (1998). Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 542-552.
2. Backer, T. E. (2001). Finding the balance: Program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: A state-of-the-art review. Retrieved February 14, 2006, from http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/pdfs/FindingBalance.pdf
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1988). The effects of school-based substance abuse education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 18, 243-264.
4. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., & Solomon, D. (1996). Prevention effects of the Child Development Project. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 12-35.
5. Bauman, L. J., Stein, R. E. K., & Ireys, H. T. (1991). Reinventing fidelity: The transfer of social technology among settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 619-639.
6. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Tortu, S., & Botvin, E. M. (1990). Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a three-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 437-446.
7. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. The Journal of The American Medical Association, 273, 1106-1112.
8. Botvin, G. J., & Botvin, E. M. (1997). School-based and community-based prevention approaches. In J. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, & R. Millman (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of substance abuse (pp. 910-927). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
9. Bruvold, W. H. (1990). A meta-analysis of the California school based risk reduction program. Journal of Drug Education, 20, 139-152.
10. Bruvold, W. H. (1993). A meta-analysis of adolescent smoking prevention programs. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 872-880.
11. Calsyn, R., Tornatzky, L. G., & Dittmar, S. (1977). Incomplete adoption of an innovation: The case of goal attainment scaling. Evaluation, 4, 128-130.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237-256.
14. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, J. D., & Lake, A. (2004). An exploration of fidelity of implementation in drug abuse prevention among five professional groups. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 47(3), 4-16.
15. Dusenbury, L., & Falco, M. (1995). Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. Journal of School Health, 65, 420-425.
16. Dusenbury, L., & Hansen, W. B. (2004). Pursuing the course from research to practice. Prevention Science, 5(1), 55-60.
17. Hansen, W. B., Graham, J. W., Wolkenstein, B. H., & Rohrbach, L. A. (1991). Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52, 568-579.
18. Hansen, W. B., & McNeal, R. B. (1996). The law of maximum expected potential effect: constraints placed on program effectiveness by mediator relationships. Health Education Research, 11, 501-507.
19. Hansen, W. B. (1996). Psychosocial approaches to prevention: Using epidemiology and etiology research to develop strategies to develop effective interventions. Psicologia Conductual, 3, 357-378.
20. Hansen, W. B. (1992). School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980-1990. Health Education Research, 7, 403-430.
21. Kramer, S. H., & Rosenthal, R. (1999). Effect sizes and significance levels in small-sample research. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 59-79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Lipsey, M. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Luborsky, L., & DeBubeis, R. J. (1984). The use of psychotherapy treatment manuals: A small revolution in psychotherapy research style. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 5-14.
24. McNeal, R. B., Hansen, W. B., Harrington, N. G., & Giles, S. M. (2004). How All Stars works: An examination of program effects on mediating variables. Health Education and Behavior, 31, 165-178.
25. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.) (1994). Reducing risk for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press.
26. Parcel, G. S., O'Hara-Tompkins, N. M., Harrist, R. B., Basen-Engquist, K. M., McCormick, L. K., Gottlieb, N. H. et al. (1995). Diffusion of an effective tobacco prevention program. Part 2: Evaluation of the adoption phase. Health Education Research, 10, 297-307.
27. Pentz, M. A., Trebow, E. A., Hansen, W. B., MacKinnon, D. P., Dwyer, J. H., Johnson, C. A. et al. (1990). Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP). Evaluation Review, 14, 264-289.
28. Perry, C. L., & Kelder, S. H. (1992). Models for effective prevention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 13, 355-363.
29. Resnicow, K., & Botvin, G. J. (1993). School-based substance use prevention programs: Why do effects decay? Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 22, 484-490.
30. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
31. Rohrbach, L. A., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1993). Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: Predictors of program implementation. Preventive Medicine, 22, 237-260.
32. Tappe, M. K., Galer-Unti, R. A., & Bailey, K. C. (1995). Long-term implementation of the Teenage Health teaching modules by trained teachers: A case study. Journal of School Health, 65, 411-415.
33. Tobler, N. S. (1994). Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany, School of Social Welfare.
34. Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71-128.
35. Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 156-167.