An integral equation approach for 2.5-dimensional forward and inverse electromagnetic scattering

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 165, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 744-762

  Abubakar, Aria ^a   van den Berg, Peter M ^a,b   Habashy, Tarek M ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER DOLL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic induction; Inverse problem; Numerical techniques; Perturbation method

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA PROCESSING; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; INVERSE PROBLEM; NUMERICAL METHOD;

EID: 33745958243     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02816.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abubakar, A. & van den Berg, P.M., 2000. Three-dimensional inverse scattering applied to cross-well induction sensors, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 1669-1681.
2. Abubakar, A., van den Berg, P.M. & Semenov, S.Y., 2003. Two- and three-dimensional algorithms for microwave imaging and inverse scattering, Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 17, 209-231.
3. Abubakar, A. & van den Berg, P.M., 2004. Iterative forward and inverse algorithms based on domain integral equations for three-dimensional electric and magnetic objects, Journal of Computational Physics, 195, 236-262.
4. Allers, A., Sezginer, A. & Druskin, V.L., 1994. Solution of 2.5-dimensional problems using the Lanczos decomposition, Radio Science, 29, 955-963.
5. Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I.A., 1968. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, New York.
6. Alumbaugh, D.L. & Newman, G.A., 1997. 3-D massively parallel electromagnetic inversion; part b - analysis of cross well EM experiment, Geophysical Journal International, 128, 355-363.
7. Alumbaugh, D.L. & Wilt, M.J., 2001. A numerical sensitivity study of three-dimensional imaging from a single borehole, Petrophysics, 42, 19-31.
8. Bloemenkamp, R.F., Abubakar, A. & van den Berg, P.M., 2001. Inversion of experimental multi-frequency data using the contrast source inversion method, Inverse Problems, 17, 1611-1622.
9. de Hoop, A.T., 1995. Handbook of Radiation and Scattering of Waves, Academic Press, London.
10. Druskin, V.L. & Knizhnerman, L.A., 1994. Spectral approach to solving three-dimensional Maxwell's diffusion equations in the time and frequency domain, Radio Science, 29, 937-953.
11. Druskin, V.L., Knizhnerman, L.A. & Lee, P., 1999. New spectral Lanczos decomposition method for induction modeling in arbitrary 3-D geometry, Geophysics, 64, 701-706.
12. Habashy, T.M., Chow, E.Y. & Dudley, D.G., 1990. Profile inversion using the renormalized source-type integral equation approach, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 38, 668-682.
13. Habashy, T.M., Oristaglio, M.L. & de Hoop, A.T., 1994. Simultaneous nonlinear reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity and conductivity, Radio Science, 29, 1101-1118.
14. Habashy, T.M. & Lulling, M., 1994. A point magnetic dipole radiator in a layered TI-anisotropic medium, Technical Report, Schlumberger-Doll Research, Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
15. Ingerman, D., Druskin, V.L. & Knizhnerman, L.A., 2000. Optimal finite difference grids and rational approximations of the square root I. Elliptic problems, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, LIII, 1039-1066.
16. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Richmond, J.H., 1965. Scattering by a dielectric cylinder of arbitary cross section shape, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 13, 334-341
18. Saad, Y. & Schultz, M.N., 1986. GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear system, SIAM J. Aci. Stat. Comp., 7, 856-859.
19. Spies, B.R. & Habashy, T.M., 1995. Sensitivity analysis of crosswell electromagnetics, Geophysics, 60, 834-845.
20. Torres-Verdin, C. & Habashy, T.M., 1994. Rapid 2.5-dimensional forward modeling & inversion via a new nonlinear scattering approximation, Radio Science, 29, 1051-1079.
21. van Bladel, J., 1991. Singular Electromagnetic Fields and Sources, Clarendon, Oxford.
22. van den Berg, P.M., 1984. Iterative computational techniques in scattering based upon the integrated square error criterion, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 32, 1063-1071.
23. van den Berg, P.M. & Kleinman, R.E., 1997. A contrast source inversion method, Inverse Problems, 13, 1607-1620.
24. van der Vorst, H.A., 1992. BICGSTAB: A fast & smoothly convergence variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear system, SIAM J. Aci. Stat. Comp., 13, 631-644.
25. Vogel, C.R., 2002. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, SIAM Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, pp. 129-150.
26. Wilt, M.J., Alumbaugh, D.L., Morrison, H.F., Becker, A., Lee, K.H. & Deszcz-Pan, M., 1995. Crosswell electromagnetic tomography: System design considerations and field results, Geophysics, 60, 871-885.
27. Zhdanov, M.S. & Chernyak, V.V., 1987. An automated method of solving the two-dimensional inverse problem of electromagnetic induction within the Earth, Transactions (Doklady) USSR Academy of Sciences, Earth Science Sections, 296, 59-63.
28. Zhdanov, M.S. & Yoshioka, K., 2003. Cross-well electromagnetic imaging in three dimensions, Exploration Geophysics, 34, 34-40.
29. Zwamborn, A.P.M. & van den Berg, P.M., 1992. The three dimensional weak form of the conjugate gradient FFT method for solving scattering problems, IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques, 40, 1757-1766.