Transport policies in light of the new economic geography: The Portuguese experience

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 450-466

  Teixeira, António Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Agglomeration; Economic geography; Portuguese transport policy

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; PORTUGAL; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 33745956305     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ANTRAM. The Structure of the Expenditure in the Transport Sector (1985, 1998), ANTRAM, Lisboa
2. Baldwin R., and Martin Ph. Agglomeration and regional growth. In: Thisse J.F., and Henderson J.V. (Eds). Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics vol. 4 (2004), North Holland, Amsterdam
3. Brakman S., Garretsen H., and Schramm M. The spatial distribution of wages and employment: estimating the Helpman-Hanson model for Germany. Journal of Regional Science 44 3 (2004) 437-466
4. Cardoso A. Workers or employers: who is shaping wage inequality?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 59 4 (1997) 523-547
5. Combes, P.-Ph., Lafourcade M., 2001. Transportation cost decline and regional inequalities: evidence from France, CEPR Working Paper 2894.
6. Dumais G., Ellison G., and Glaeser L. Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. The Review of Economics and Statistics LXXXIV 2 (2002) 193-204
7. Forslid R., Haaland J., and Knarvik K. A U-shaped Europe? A simulation study of industrial location. Journal of International Economics 57 (2002) 273-297
8. Fujita M., Krugman P., and Venables A. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge
9. Hanson G. Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics 67 1 (2005) 1-24
10. Head K., and Mayer T. The empirics of agglomeration and trade. In: Thisse J.F., and Henderson J.V. (Eds). Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics vol. 4 (2004), North Holland, Amsterdam
11. Instituto Nacional Estatística. Regional Counts (1998, 1985), INE, Lisboa
12. Instituto Nacional Estatística. The Integrated Count System of Industrial Companies (1999, 1986), INE, Lisboa
13. Instituto Nacional Estatística. The Input-Output Table (1999, 1986), INE, Lisboa
14. Instituto Nacional Estatística. Indices of Final and Intermediate Goods (1999, 1986), INE, Lisboa
15. Instituto Nacional Estatística. Regional Counts (1999, 1986), INE, Lisboa
16. Instituto Nacional Estatística. Establishments and Plants (1999, 1986), INE, Lisboa
17. Limão N., and Venables A. Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport cost and trade. World Bank Economic Review 15 (2001) 451-479
18. Kelejian H., and Prucha I. 2SLS and OLS in a spatial autoregressive model with equal spatial weights. Regional Science and Urban Economics 32 (2002) 691-707
19. Krugman P. Geography and Trade (1991), LUP, Leuven
20. Overman H., and Redding A. The economic geography of trade, production and income: a survey. In: Harrigan J., and Choi K. (Eds). Handbook of International Trade (2003), Basil Blackwell, London
21. Pereira A., and Andraz J. Investimento público em infraestructuras de transportes em Portugal continental (2001), Ministério do Planeamento, Lisboa
22. Redding S., and Venables A. Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics 62 1 (2004) 53-82
23. Ross M. Wages and market potential in Germany. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 21 (2001) 171-247
24. Sutton J. Marshall's Tendencies: What Can Economists Know? (2000), LUP, Leuven
25. Venables A., and Gasoriek M. Evaluating regional infrastructure: a computable equilibrium approach. The Socio-Economic Impact of Projects Financed by the Cohesion Fund-A Modelling Approach vol. 2 (1999), Office for official publications of the European communities, Luxembourg
26. Walz U. Transport costs, intermediate goods, and localized growth. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (1996) 671-695