A new discrimination method for the Concealed Information Test using pretest data and within-individual comparisons

Biological Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 157-164

  Matsuda, Izumi ^a   Hirota, Akihisa ^a   Ogawa, Tokihiro ^a   Takasawa, Noriyoshi ^b   Shigemasu, Kazuo ^c  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POLICE SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b EDOGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Autonomic responses; Concealed information test; Individual differences; Latent class discrimination method; Within individual comparison

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONCEALED INFORMATION TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; DATA ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST;

ADULT; AROUSAL; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; BAYES THEOREM; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CRIME; FEMALE; FINGERS; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; GUILT; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; LIE DETECTION; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; RESPIRATION; ROC CURVE;

EID: 33745954960     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adachi K. Statistical classification procedures for polygraph tests of guilty knowledge. Behaviormetrika 22 (1995) 49-66
2. Ben-Shakhar G., and Elaad E. Leakage of relevant information to innocent examinees in the GKT: an attempt to reduce false-positive outcomes by introducing target stimuli. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1999) 651-660
3. Ben-Shakhar G., and Furedy J.J. Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective. (1990), Springer-Verlag, New York
4. Engel B.T. Stimulus-response and individual-response specificity. Archives of General Psychiatry 2 (1960) 305-313
5. Foerster F. Psychophysiological response specificities: a replication over a 12-month period. Biological Psychology 21 (1985) 169-182
6. Gronau N., Ben-Shakhar G., and Cohen A. Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005) 147-158
7. Hirota A., and Takasawa N. Seisinseirigakuteki kyogikennsyutu ni okeru massyouhihuketuryuuryou [Peripheral skin blood flow in psychophysiological detection of deception]. Japanese Journal of Physiological Psychology and Psychophysiology 20 (2002) 49-59
8. Kircher J.C., and Raskin D.C. Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1998) 291-302
9. Lacey J.I., and Lacey B.C. Verification and extension of the principle of autonomic response-stereotypy. American Journal of Psychology 71 (1958) 50-73
10. Lazarsfeld P.F., and Henry N.W. Latent structure analysis (1968), Houghton-Mifflin, New York
11. Levis D.J., and Smith J.E. Getting individual differences in autonomic reactivity to work for instead of against you: determining the dominant "psychological" stress channel on the basis of a "biological" stress test. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 346-353
12. Lykken D.T. The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology 43 (1959) 385-388
13. Marwitz M., and Stemmler G. On the status of individual response specificity. Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 1-15
14. Olsen D.E., Harris J.C., Capps M.H., and Ansley N. Computerized polygraph scoring system. Journal of Forensic Sciences 42 (1997) 61-71
15. Raftery A.L., and Lewis S. How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler?. In: Bernardo J.M., Berger J.O., Dawid A.P., and Smith A.F.M. (Eds). Bayesian statistics 4 (1992), Oxford University Press 763-774
16. Shigemasu K., Ohmori T., and Hoshino T. Market segmentation method from the Bayesian viewpoint. In: Schader M., Gaal W., and Vichi M. (Eds). Between data science and applied data analysis (2002), Springer-Verlag, New York 595-603