Pay-for-performance: An overview for pediatrics

Journal of Pediatrics

Volumn 149, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 120-124

  Freed, Gary L ^a   Uren, Rebecca L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAID; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745953610     PISSN: 00223476     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.03.023     Document Type: Note

References (36)

1. Romano M. Performance anxiety. is it too late for physicians to set their own rules on pay-for-performance?. Mod Healthc 35 (2005) 6-14
2. Rosenthal M., Frank R.G., Zhonghe L., and Epstein A.M. Early experience with pay-for-performance. JAMA 294 (2005) 1788-1793
3. Damberg C.L., Raube K., Williams T., and Shortell S.M. Paying for performance. implementing a statewide project in California. Qual Manag Health Care 14 (2005) 66-79
4. Town R., Kane R., Johnson P., and Butler M. Economic incentives and physicians' delivery of preventive care. a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 28 (2005) 234-240
5. Foubister V. Quality matters issue of the month: pay-for-performance in Medicaid. Available at http://www.cmwf.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=274106. Accessed August 2005.
6. Medicaid managed care program provides fiscal rewards for performance. Perform Improv Advis 9 (2005) 80-81
7. Bonis P.A. Quality incentive payment systems. promise and problems. J Clin Gastroenterol 39 (2005) S176-S182
8. Rosenthal M.B., Fernandopulle R., Song H.R., and Landon B. Paying for quality. providers' incentives for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood) 23 (2004) 127-141
9. Terry K. Pay for performance. a double-edged sword. Med Econ 82 (2005) 64-71
10. Pay-for-performance study offers benchmarks on feedback, payment trends. Capit Rates Data 10 (2005) 5-7
11. Rowe J.W. Pay-for-performance and accountability. related themes in improving health care (2005) Presented at the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation Forum, Sunriver, Oregon, August 9
12. American Medical Association. AMA principles and guidelines for P4P. Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/go/pfp. Accessed August 2005
13. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Principles for the construct of pay-for-performance programs. Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/publicpolicy/pay.htm. Accessed August 2005.
14. Goldfield N., Burford R., Averill R., Boissonnault B., Kelly W., Kravis T., et al. Pay for performance. an excellent idea that simply needs implementation. Qual Manag Health Care 14 (2005) 31-44
15. Endsley S., Kirkegaard M., Baker G., and Murcko A.C. Getting rewards for your results. pay-for-performance programs. Fam Pract Manag 11 (2004) 45-50
16. Henley E. Pay-for-performance. what can you expect?. J Fam Pract 54 (2005) 609-612
17. Kertesz L. Driving positive change through programs that reward quality performance. AHIP Cover 46 (2005) 30-38
18. American Hospital Association. Paying for performance. creating incentives for quality improvement. AHA TrendWatch 5 (2003) 1-8
19. Ferman J.H. Understanding pay-for-performance programs. Healthc Exec 19 (2004) 48-50
20. Ferman J.H. Pay for performance. obstacles/implications. Despite challenges, pay-for-performance programs are here to stay. Healthc Exec 19 (2004) 44-46
21. Ferman J.H. Pay for performance gaining popularity. this evolving payment methodology holds significant implications for providers. Healthc Exec 19 (2004) 50-52
22. Keenan P.S., and Kline J. Paying for performance. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) (2004) 1-6
23. Klein S. Quality matters issue of the month: defining high performance Available at http://www.cmwf.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=327240 Accessed December 2005.
24. National Quality Forum. NQF news online. Available at http://www.qualityforum.org/news/home.htm. Accessed August 2005.
25. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance: improving clinical quality and consumer decisionmaking. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/aqaback.htm. Accessed August 2005.
26. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance recommended starter set: clinical performance measures for ambulatory care. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/aqastart.htm. Accessed August 2005
27. Landon B.E. Commentary on "Penetrating the 'black box'. financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services," by DA Conrad and JB Christianson. Med Care Res Rev 61 (2004) 69S-75S
28. Conrad D.A., and Christianson J.B. Penetrating the "black box". financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services. Med Care Res Rev 61 (2004) 37S-68S
29. Gosfield A.G. P4P. transitional at best. Manag Care 14 (2005) 64-69
30. Strunk B.C., and Hurley R.E. Paying for quality. health plans try carrots instead of sticks. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change (2004) 1-4
31. Siegel S. Pay for performance. is this the cure for Medicare's ills?. Health Care Law Mon 5 (2005) 3-10
32. Epstein A.M., Lee T.H., and Hamel M.B. Paying physicians for high-quality care. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 406-410
33. Millenson M.L. Pay for performance. the best worst choice. Qual Saf Health Care 13 (2004) 323-324
34. Performance-based programs gain ground, offer "real dollars" to providers. Perform Improv Advis 8 (2004) 27-31
35. Hagland M. Fast track to rewards. in the pay-for-performance event, everyone wins. Healthc Inform 22 (2005) 26-30
36. Benko L.B. On the bandwagon. CareFirst joins pay-for-performance trend. Mod Healthc 35 (2005) 10-11