Defining pictorial style: Lessons from linguistics and computer graphics

Axiomathes

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 319-351

  Willats, John ^a   Durand, Fredo ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745949983     PISSN: 11221151     EISSN: 15728390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10516-004-5449-7     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agrawala, M., D. Zorin, and T. Munzner: 2000, 'Artistic multiprojetion rendering', Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 2000.
2. Baron-Cohen, S., R. Campbell, and A. Karmiloff-Smith et al.: 1995, 'Are Children with Autism Blind to the Mentalistic Significance of Eyes?', British Journal of Developmental Psychology 13, 379-398.
3. Burton, E.: 1997, 'Artificial Innocence: Interactions Between the Study of Children's Drawing and Artificial Intelligence', Leonardo 30 (4), 301-309.
4. Carter, B.A.R.: 1967, 'The Use of Perspective in Saenredam', Burlington Magazine 109, 594-595.
5. Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, The Hague: Mouton.
6. Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Cohen, H.: 1979, What is an Image? http://www.kurzweilcyberart. com/aaron/hi_essays.html
8. Cohen, H.: 1999, Colouring Without Seeing: a Problem in Machine Creativity, http://www.kurzweilcyberart.com/aaron/hi_essays.html
9. Dubery, F. and J. Willats: 1972, Drawing Systems, London: Studio Vista; New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
10. Durand, F.: 2002, 'An invitation to discuss computer depiction', Proceedings of the Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, June 2002.
11. Gibson, J.J.: 1971, 'The Information Available in Pictures', Leonardo 4, 27-35.
12. Gombrich, E.H.: 1960/1988, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Oxford: Phaidon Press.
13. Gooch and Gooch: 2001, Non-Photorealistic Rendering, A.K. Peters.
14. Grabli, S., F. Durand, E. Turquin, and F. Sillion: 2003, A procedural approach to Style for NPR line drawing from 3D models. INRIA Technical Report, 2003.
15. Hagen, M.A.: 1986, Varieties of Realism: Geometries of Representational Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Huffman, D.A.: 1971, 'Impossible Objects as Nonsense Sentences', in B. Meltzer and D. Mitchie (eds.), Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 295-323.
17. Kemp, M.: 1992, The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven, CO.: Yale University Press.
18. Kennedy, J.M.: 1974, A Psychology of Picture Perception, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Kennedy, J.M.: 1983, 'What Can we Learn about Pictures from the Blind'? American Scientis, 71, 19-26.
20. Koenderink, J.J. and A.J. van Doorn 1982, 'The Shape of Smooth Objects and the Way Contours End', Perception 11, 129-137.
21. Marr, D.: 1982, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
22. Moskowitz, B.A.: 1978, 'The Acquisition of Language', Scientific American 239, 82-96.
23. Palmer, S.E.: 1999, Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Pearson, D., E. Hanna and K. Martinez 1990, 'Computer Generated Cartoons', in H. Barlow, C. Blakemore and M. Weston-Smith (eds.), Images and Understanding Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46-60.
25. Rawson, P.: 1987, Drawing, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26. Strothotte, T. and S. Schlechtweg: 2002, Non-Photorealistic Computer Graphics. Modeling, Rendering, and Animation, San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann.
27. Thouless, R.H.: 1933, 'A racial difference in perception', Journal of Social Psychology 4 (3), 330-339.
28. Thorne, J.P.: 1972, 'Generative Grammar and Stylistic Analysis', in J. Lyons (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, pp. 185-197.
29. Waltz, D.: 1975, 'Understanding Line Drawings of Scenes with shadows', in P.H. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, New York: McGraw- Hill, pp. 19-91.
30. White, J.: 1967, The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space, London: Faber and Faber.
31. Willats, J.: 1985, 'Drawing Systems Revisited: The Role of Denotation Systems in Children's Figure Drawings', in N.H. Freeman and M.V. Cox (eds.), Visual Order: The Nature and Development of Pictorial Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78-100.
32. Willats, J.: 1992a, 'Seeing Lumps, Sticks and Slabs in Silhouettes'. Perception 21, 481-496.
33. Willats, J.: 1992b, 'The Representation of Extendedness in Children's Drawings of Sticks and Discs', Child Development 63, 692-710.
34. Willats, J.: 1997, Art and Representations: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35. Willats, J.: 2002a, 'The Rules of Representation', in P. Smith and C. Wilde (eds.), A Companion to Art Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 411-425.
36. Willats, J.: 2002b, 'The Third Domain: The Role of Pictorial Images in Picture Perception and Production', Axiomathes 13 (1), 1-15.
37. Willats, J. (in press), 'Optical Laws or Symbolic Rules: The Dual Nature of Pictorial Systems', In H. Hecht, B. Schwartz and M. Atherton (eds.), Reconceiving Pictorial Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Wölfflin, H.: 1932, Principles of Art History, London: G. Bell & Sons.
39. Wollheim, R.: 1977, 'Representation: The Philosophical Contribution to Psychology', in G. Butterworth (ed.), The Child's Representation of the World, New York: Plenum Press, pp.173-188.
40. Wollheim, R.: 1987, Painting as an Art, London: Thames and Hudson.