Clinicians' evaluations of fetal oximetry sensor placement in a multicentre randomised trial (the FOREMOST trial)

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 234-239

  East, Christine E ^a   Brennecke, Shaun P ^b   Chan, Fung Yee ^a   King, James F ^b   Beller, Elaine M ^a   Colditz, Paul B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biomedical; Fetal monitoring; Nurse midwives; Physicians; Pulse oximetry; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS MONITORING; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; JOB EXPERIENCE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MIDWIFE ATTITUDE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OXYGEN SATURATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSOR; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, THIRD; MIDWIFERY; OXIMETRY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICIANS; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 33745949369     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: 1479828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00568.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. East CE, Colditz PB. Women's evaluations of their experience with fetal intrapartum oxygen saturation monitoring and participation in a research project. Midwifery 1996; 12: 93-97.
2. East CE, Brennecke SP, King JF, Chan FY, Colditz PB, on behalf of the FOREMOST Study Group. Women's evaluations of their experience in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry (the FOREMOST trial). Birth 2006; 33: 101-109.
3. Colditz PB, Begg LM, East CE. Fetal pulse oximetry: Instrumentation and recent clinical experience. Clin Perinatol 1999; 26: 869-880.
4. East CE, Colditz PB, Begg LM, Brennecke SP. Update on intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 119-124.
5. Kuhnert M, Seelbach-Gobel B, Di Renzo GC, Howarth E, Butterwegge M, Muray JM. Guidelines for the use of fetal pulse oximetry during labor and delivery. Prenat Neonatal Med 1998; 3: 432-433.
6. East CE, Colditz PB. Clinicians'perceptions of placing a fetal oximetry sensor. J Qual Clin Prac 2000; 20: 161-163.
7. East CE, Brennecke SP, King JF, Chan FY, Colditz PB, on behalf of the FOREMOST Study Group. The effect of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry, in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern, on operative delivery rates for non-reassuring fetal status: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial (the FOREMOST trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 606-616.
8. East CE, Brennecke SP, King JF, Chan FY, Colditz PB, on behalf of the FOREMOST Study Group. The FOREMOST Study. [accessed 22 March 2006]. Available from: http://www.som.uq.edu.au/som/women_foremosttrial.shtml.
9. East CE, Dunster KR, Colditz PB. Fetal intrapartum oxygen saturation monitoring: An analysis of 118 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 37: 397-401.
10. Centre for Epidemiology and Research NDoH. New South Wales Mothers and Babies 2001. Sydney: NSW Public Health Bull. 2002; 13 (S4): 2002.
11. Nellcor Puritan Bennett. OxiFirst Fetal Pulse Oximetry System Clinical Use Guide. Pleasanton, CA: Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Nellcor Puritan Bennett Division, 2003.
12. Fuchs VR, Sox HC Jr. Physicians'views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20: 30-42.
13. Johnson N. Development and potential of fetal pulse oximetry. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 3: 193-200.
14. Goffinet F, Langer B, Carbonne B et al. Multicenter study on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry: 1. Methodologic evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1238-1246.
15. Therapeutic Goods Administration. [accessed 18 July 2005] Available from: http://www.tga.gov.au/index.htm.
16. The NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. [accessed 18 July 2005] Available from: http://www.ncchta.org/.
17. INAHTA: International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. [accessed 18 July 2005] Available from: http://www.inahta.org/inahta_web/index.asp.
18. Food and Drug Administration. [accessed 18 July 2005] Available from: http://www.fda.gov/.
19. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). [accessed 18 July 2005] Available from: http://www.ccohta.ca/ entry_e.html.
20. Klein EE, Tepper J, Sontag M, Franklin M, Ling C, Kubo D. Technology assessment of multileaf collimation: A North American users survey. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 44: 705-710.
21. May C, Gask L, Atkinson T, Ellis N, Mair F, Esmail A. Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice. The case of telepsychiatry. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1889-1901.