An ontology-based procedure for generating object model from text description

Knowledge and Information Systems

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 93-108

  Vongdoiwang, Waralak ^a   Batanov, Dencho N ^a  

^a ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Abstract data types (ADTs); CORPORUM; Object model; Ontologies; Ontology library

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT DATA TYPES;

CONVERSION PROCESS; CORPORUM; GENERIC CHARACTERISTICS; OBJECT MODEL; ONTOLOGY-BASED; PROBLEM DOMAIN;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 33745942509     PISSN: 02191377     EISSN: 02193116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-005-0218-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahmed K, Ayers D, Birbeck M, et al. (2001) Professional XML Meta Data. Wrox, Birmingham, UK
2. Batanov DN, Arch-int S (2003) Toward construction of business components: An approach to development of web-based application systems, In: Peckham J, Lloyd SJ (eds) Practicing Software Engineering in the 21st Century. IRM, pp 178-194
3. Bennett S, McRobb S, Farmer R (1999) Object-oriented system analysis and design using UML. McGraw-Hill, International Editions London, 2000
4. Booch G (1993) Object-oriented analysis and design with application, 2nd edn. Benjamin-Cummings, Redwood City, CA
5. Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR, Benjamin VR (1999) What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell Syst 14(1):20-26
6. Coad P, North D, Mayfield M (1995) Object models: Strategies, patterns, and applications. Object International, Yourdon Press Computing Series, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
7. Coleman D, Arnold P, Bodoff S, et al. (1994) Object-oriented development: The Fusion method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
8. Deridder D, Wouters B (1999) The use of ontologies as a backbone for software engineering tools. Programming Technology Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
9. Ellzey KS (1991) Data structures for computer information systems, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York
10. Engles R (2001) Del 6: CORPORUM - OntoExtract ontology extraction tool, On-To-Knowledge: Content-driven knowledge management tools through evolving ontologies. 1ST project IST-1999-1032, On-To-Knowledge
11. Engles RHP, Bremdal BA, Jones R (2001) CORPORUM: A workbench for the semantic web. EXML/PKDD workshop, CognIT a.s.
12. Gil Y, Ratnakar V (2002) A comparison of (semantic) markup languages, In: Proceedings of the 15th International FLAIRS Conference, Special Track on Semantic Web, Pensacola, FL
13. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5:199-220
14. Gruber TR (1994) Toward principles for the design of ontologies use for knowledge sharing. Proc IJHCS-1994, 5(6):907-928
15. Gruninger M, Lee JT (2002) Ontology applications and design. Commun ACM 45(2):40-42
16. Heflin J, Volz R, Dale J (2002) Requirements for a Web Ontology Language. W3C Working Draft
17. Johansson I (1998) Pattern as an ontological category, In: Guarino N (ed) Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 86-94
18. Klein M (2001) XML, RDF, and relatives. IEEE Intell Syst, March/April, pp 26-28
19. Klein M (2002) Interpreting XML documents via an RDF schema ontology, In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA '02). IEEE CS
20. Maedache A, Staab S (2001) Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intell Syst, March/April, pp 72-79
21. Manola F (1999) Technologies for a web object model. IEEE Internet Comput, January-February, pp 38-47
22. Noy NF, Sintek M, Decker S, et al. (2001) Creating semantic web contents with Protege-2000. IEEE Intell Syst, March/April, pp 60-61
23. Swartout W (1999) Ontologies. IEEE Intell Syst, January/February, pp 18-25
24. Weiss MA (1993) Data structures and algorithm analysis. C. Benjamin/ Cummings, Florida International University, Redwood City, CA