A selected history of expectation bias in physics

American Journal of Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 578-583

  Jeng, Monwhea ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745935402     PISSN: 00029505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1119/1.2186333     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. A. C. Doyle, A Scandal in Bohemia, in Sherlock Holmes: The Complete Illustrated Short Stories (Chancellor, Great Britain, 1985), p. 12.
2. Sir Arthur Eddington, New Pathways in Science (University of Michigan Press, 1959), p. 211.
3. The photographs were crude forgeries produced by two young girls using cutouts from a magazine and freehand drawings. J. Randi, Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions (Prometheus, Buffalo, NY, 1982).
4. S. G. Brush, "The role of history in the teaching of physics," Phys. Teach. 7, 271-280 (1969).
5. M. A. B. Whitaker, "History and quasi-history in physics education. I," Phys. Educ. 14, 108-112 (1979).
6. A. Wróblewski, "de Mora Luminis: A spectacle in two acts with a prologue and an epilogue," Am. J. Phys. 53, 620-630 (1985).
7. G. Holton, "Einstein, Michelson, and the 'crucial' experiment," Isis 60, 132-197 (1969).
8. A. Van Helden, "Saturn and his anses," J. Hist. Astron. 5, 105-121 (1974).
9. M. J. Nye, "N-rays: An episode in the history and psychology of science," Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 11, 125-156 (1980).
10. I. Langmuir, "Pathological science," Colloquium at Knolls Research Laboratory, 18 December 1953, Phys. Today edited by R. N. Hall; reprinted in Phys. Today 42(10), 36-48 (1989).
11. W. F. Brewer and B. L. Lambert, "The theory-ladenness of observation and the theory-ladenness of the rest of the scientific process," Philos. Sci. 68, S176-S182 (2001).
12. W. J. Bisson and W. H. Dennen, "Newton and spectral lines," Science 135, 921-922 (1962).
13. E. G. Boring, "Newton and the spectral lines," Science 136, 600-601 (1962).
14. J. V. Narlikar and S. Bhate, "Search for ancient Indian records of the sighting of supernovae," Curr. Sci. 81, 701-705 (2001).
15. E. F. Redish, Teaching Physics (Wiley, New York, 1993), pp. 130-132.
16. R. F. Gunstone and R. T. White, "Understanding of gravity," Sci. Educ. 65, 291-299 (1981).
17. R. Rosenthal, "How often are our numbers wrong'?," Am. Psychol. 33, 1005-1008 (1978).
18. R. Rosenthal, Experimenter Effects in Behavior Research, enlarged ed. (Irvington, New York, 1976).
19. J. Worrall, "The pressure of light: The strange case of the vacillating 'crucial experiment'," Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci 13, 133-171 (1982). This paper presents a fascinating history of this and other light pressure experiments.
20. A. Franklin, Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 2002), Chap. 6.
21. P. Galison, How Experiments End (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987).
22. Reference 21, p. 85 (Table 3.2).
23. R. S. Westfall, "Newton and the fudge factor," Science 179, 751-758 (1973).
24. F. S. Crawford, Jr., Waves (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), p. 167. Crawford writes "Now comes the interesting question: How could Newton come so close to the right answer (which shows that something is right with his derivation) and yet miss it by 15% (which shows that something is wrong with his derivation)?"
25. T. S. Kuhn, "The caloric theory of adiabatic compression," Isis 49, 132-140 (1958).
26. T. S. Kuhn, "The function of measurement in modern physical science," Isis 52, 161-193 (1961).
27. R. Fox, The Caloric Theory of Gases: From Lavoisier to Regnault (Oxford U.P., Clarendon, 1971), pp. 162-165.
28. v in the speed of sound was valid despite his use of caloric theory, but his method of calculating the value of γ from the experimental results of Delaroche and Bérard was not.
29. S. Eidelman et al., "Review of particle properties," Phys. Lett. B 592, 1-1109 (2004); see pp. 16-18.
30. R. K. Kelly et al., "Review of particle properties," Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, S1-S286 (1980); see pp. S284-S286.
31. A. Franklin, "Forging, cooking, trimming, and riding on the bandwagon," Am. J. Phys. 52, 786-793 (1984).
32. M. Henrion and B. Fischhoff, "Assessing uncertainty in physical constants," Am. J. Phys. 54, 791-798 (1986).
33. R. A. Fisher, "Has Mendel's work been rediscovered?," Ann. Sci. 1, 115-137 (1936).
34. A number of authors have also taken issue with Fisher's statistical arguments, although few find enough problems with Fisher's analysis to conclude that Mendel's data are unproblematic.
35. R. S. Root-Bernstein. "Mendel and methodology," Hist. Sci. 21, 275-295 (1983).
36. R. C. Olby, The Origins of Mendelism (Schocken, New York, 1966), pp. 182-185.
37. Root-Bernstein has pointed out a logical flaw in Olby's evidence that such optional stopping occurred, but is unable to rule it out as a possible mechanism (Ref. 35).
38. G. Holton, "Subelectrons, presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft dispute," Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 9, 161-224 (1978).
39. R. A. Millikan, "On the elementary electrical charge and the Avogadro constant," Phys. Rev. 2, 109-143 (1913); seep. 138.
40. S. G. Brush, The Kind of Motion We Call Heat: A History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases in the 19th Century (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976), pp. 189-191.