Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1052-1058

  Glasgow, Sean C ^a   Birnbaum, Elisa H ^a   Kodner, Ira J ^a   Fleshman, James W ^a   Dietz, David W ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anal manometry; Procidentia; Proctectomy; Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency; Rectal prolapse

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS CONTINENCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL CONDITION IMPROVEMENT; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREVALENCE; PUDENDAL NERVE; RECTUM PROLAPSE; RECTUM RESECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745935210     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0538-x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. RD Madoff A Mellgren 1999 One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery Dis Colon Rectum 42 441 450
2. EH Birnbaum L Stamm JF Rafferty RD Fry IJ Kodner JW Fleshman 1996 Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 39 1215 1221
3. OB Johansen SD Wexner N Daniel JJ Nogueras DG Jagelman 1993 Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly Dis Colon Rectum 36 767 772
4. AP Sainio PE Voutilainen AI Husa 1991 Recovery of anal sphincter function following transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse: cause of improved continence? Dis Colon Rectum 34 816 821
5. K Yoshioka G Hyland MR Keighley 1989 Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence Br J Surg 76 64 68
6. I Schultz A Mellgren BY Nilsson A Dolk B Holmstrom 1998 Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy Dis Colon Rectum 41 1392 1398
7. JG Williams WD Wong L Jensen DA Rothenberger SM Goldberg 1991 Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study Dis Colon Rectum 34 209 216
8. A Tsunoda N Yasuda N Yokoyama G Kamiyama M Kusano 2003 Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis Dis Colon Rectum 46 1260 1265
9. K Azimuddin IT Khubchandani L Rosen JJ Stasik RD Riether JF Reed 2001 Rectal prolapse: a search for the "best" operation Am Surg 67 622 627
10. AJ Brown JH Anderson RF [tmp] McKee IG Finlay 2004 Strategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria Dis Colon Rectum 47 103 107
11. MH Kimmins BK Evetts J Isler R Billingham 2001 The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 44 565 570
12. JG Williams DA Rothenberger RD Madoff SM Goldberg 1992 Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 35 830 834
13. ML Prasad RK Pearl H Abcarian CP Orsay RL Nelson 1986 Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 29 547 552
14. RE Karulf RD Madoff SM Goldberg 2001 Rectal prolapse Curr Probl Surg 38 771 832
15. AM Metcalf V Loening-Baucke 1988 Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse Am J Surg 155 206 210
16. DS Kim CB Tsang WD Wong AC Lowry SM Goldberg RD Madoff 1999 Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results Dis Colon Rectum 42 460 466
17. LS Dvorkin CL Chan CH Knowles NS Williams PJ Lunniss SM Scott 2004 Anal sphincter morphology in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 47 198 203
18. K Yoshioka G Hyland MR Keighley 1988 Physiological changes after postanal repair and parameters predicting outcome Br J Surg 75 1220 1224