Satiation effects in piscivore prey size selection

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 78-85

  Turesson, Hakan ^a   Bronmark C ^a   Wolf, A ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Gut; Predation; Prey choice; Sander; Selectivity; Stomach

Indexed keywords

PISCIVORE; PREDATION; PREY SIZE; SIZE SELECTION;

EID: 33745931931     PISSN: 09066691     EISSN: 16000633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00124.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Beauchamp, D.A., Baldwin, C.M., Vogel, J.L. & Gubala, C.P. 1999. Estimating diel, depth-specific foraging opportunities with a visual encounter rate model for pelagic piscivores. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 128-139.
2. Bence, J.R. & Murdoch, W.W. 1986. Prey-size selection by the Mosquitofish: Relation to optimal diet theory. Ecology 67: 324-336.
3. Brabrand, Å. & Faafeng, B. 1993. Habitat shift in roach (Rutilus rutilus) induced by pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) introduction: Predation risk versus pelagic behaviour. Oecologia 95: 38-46.
4. Brönmark, C., Dahl, J. & Greenberg, L.A. 1997. Complex interactions in freshwater benthic food chains. In: Streit, B., Städler, T. & Lively, C.M., eds. Evolutionary ecology of freshwater fish. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. 55-88.
5. Campbell, E.A. 1998. Predation by small walleyes on yellow perch: effects of prey-size distribution. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127: 588-597.
6. Carpenter, S.R. & Kitchell, J.F. 1993. The trophic cascade in lakes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chesson, J. 1983. The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64: 1297-1304.
8. Christensen, B. 1996. Predator foraging capabilities and prey behaviours: Pre- versus postcapture constraints on size-dependent predator-prey interactions. Oikos 76: 368-380.
9. Einfalt, L.M. & Wahl, D.H. 1997. Prey selection by juvenile walleye as influenced by prey morphology and behaviour. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2618-2626.
10. Emlen, J.M. 1966. The role of time and energy in food preference. American Naturalist 100: 611-617.
11. Essington, T.E., Hodgson, J.R. & Kitchell, J.F. 2000. Role of satiation in the functional response of a piscivore, largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 548-556.
12. Gill, A.B. & Hart, P.J.B. 1998. Stomach capacity as a directing factor in prey-size selection of three-spined stickleback. Journal of Fish Biology 53: 897-900.
13. Gill, A.B. & Hart, P.J.B. 1999. Dynamic changes in prey choice by stickleback during simultaneous encounter with large prey. Journal of Fish Biology 55: 1317-1327.
14. Glova, G.J. 1977. Critical swimming speeds of Coho salmon (Oncorhyncus kisutch) fry to smolt stages in relation to salinity and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34: 151-154.
15. Hambright, D.K. 1991. Experimental analysis of prey selection by largemouth bass: Role of predator mouth width and prey body depth. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120: 500-508.
16. Hart, P.J.B. & Connellan, B. 1984. Cost of prey capture, growth rate and ration size in pike, Esox lucius L., as functions of prey weight. Journal of Fish Biology 25: 279-292.
17. Hartman, K.J. 2000. The influence of size on striped bass foraging. Marine Ecology Progress Series 194: 263-268.
18. Howick, G.L. & O'Brien, J.W. 1983. Piscivorous feeding behaviour of largemouth bass: An experimental analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 112: 508-516.
19. Hoyle, J.A. & Keast, A. 1987. The effect of morphology and size on handling time in a piscivore, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmonides). Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 1972-1977.
20. Ivlev, V.S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Jeschke, M., Kopp, M. & Tollrian, R. 2002. Predator functional responses: Discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecological Monographs 72: 95-112.
22. Johansson, J., Turesson, H. & Persson, A. 2004. Active selection for large guppies, Poecilia reticulata, by the pike cichlid, Crenicichla saxatilis. Oikos 105: 595-605.
23. Juanes, F. 1994. What determines prey-size selectivity in piscivorous fishes ? In: Stouder, D.J., Fresh, K.L. & Feller, R.J., eds. Theory and application in fish feeding ecology. Belle W. Baruch Library in Marine Sciences, No. 18. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 79-100.
24. Keskinen, T. & Marjomäki, T.J. 2004. Diet and prey size spectrum of pikeperch in lakes in central Finland. Journal of Fish Biology 65: 1147-1153.
25. Krause, J., Reeves, P. & Hoare, D. 1998. Positioning behaviour in roach shoals: The role of body length and nutritional state. Behaviour 135: 1031-1039.
26. Lima, S.L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. Bioscience 48: 25-34.
27. Lundvall, D., Svanbäck, R., Persson, L. & Byström, P. 1999. Size-dependent predation in piscivores: Interactions between predator foraging and prey avoidance abilities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 1285-1292.
28. Manly, B.F.J., Miller, P. & Cook, L.M. 1972. Analysis of a selective predation experiment. American Naturalist 106: 719-736.
29. Mikheev, V.N. & Wanzenböck, J. 1999. Satiation-dependent, intra-cohort variations in prey size selection of young roach (Rutilus rutilus). Oecologia 121: 499-505.
30. Nilsson, P.A. & Brönmark, C. 1999. Foraging among cannibals and kleptoparasites: Effects of prey-size on pike behavior. Behavioural Ecology 10: 557-556.
31. Nilsson, P.A. & Brönmark, C. 2000. Prey vulnerability to a gape-size limited predator: Behaviour and morphological impacts on northern pike piscivory. Oikos 88: 539-546.
32. Pettersson, L.B. & Brönmark, C. 1993. Trading of safety against food: State dependent habitat choice and foraging in crucian carp. Oecologia 95: 353-357.
33. Pierce, G.J. & Ollason, J.G. 1987. Eight reasons why optimal foraging theory is a complete waste of time. Oikos 49: 111-118.
34. Popova, O.A. & Sytina, L.A. 1977. Food and feeding relations of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in various waters of the USSR. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34: 1559-1570.
35. Reimchen, T.E. 1991. Evolutionary attributes of headfirst prey manipulation and swallowing in piscivores. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 2912-2916.
36. Rindorf, A. 2002. The effect of stomach fullness on food intake of whiting in the North Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 61: 579-593.
37. Scharf, F.S., Buckel, J.A. & Juanes, F. 1998. Predation by juvenile piscivorous bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix): The influence of prey to predator size ratio and prey type on predator capture success and prey profitability. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1695-1703.
38. Schluter, D. 1981. Does the theory of optimal diets apply in complex environments ? American Naturalist 118: 139-147.
39. Sih, A. & Christensen, B. 2001. Optimal diet theory: When does it work and when does it fail ? Animal Behaviour 61: 379-390.
40. Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Turesson, H., Persson, A. & Brönmark, C. 2002. Prey size selection in piscivorous pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) includes active prey choice. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 11: 223-233.
42. Vandenbyllaardt, L., Ward, F.J., Braekevelt, C.R. & McIntyre, D.B. 1991. Relationships between turbidity, piscivory, and development of the retina in juvenile walleyes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120: 382-390.
43. Ward, D. 1993. Foraging theory, like all other fields of science, needs multiple working hypotheses. Oikos 76: 376-378.