Comparative studies on field performance of micropropagated and conventionally propagated sugarcane plants

Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 25-29

  Sood, Neeru ^a   Gupta, Piyush Kumar ^a   Srivastava, R K ^a,b   Gosal, S S ^a  

^a Research and Development Centre   (India)

^b G B PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Comparative studies; Field performance; Micropropagation; Sugarcane

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745931877     PISSN: 18173721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3329/ptcb.v16i1.1102     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Dhaliwal RK, Malik CP, Gosal SS and Dhaliwal LS (1997a) Studies on hardening of micropropagated sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plantlets. I. Root and shoot parameters. Ann. Bio. 13(1): 21-25.
2. Dhaliwal RK, Malik CP, Gosal SS and Dhaliwal LS (1997b) Studies on hardening of micropropagated sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plantlets. II. Leaf parameters and biochemical estimation. Ann. Bio. 13(1): 15-20.
3. Gosal SS, Thind KS and Dhaliwal HS (1998) Micropropagation of sugarcane - An efficient protocol for commercial plant production. Crop Improv. 25: 1-5.
4. Hendre RR, Iver RS and Kotwal M (1983) Rapid multiplication of sugarcane by tissue culture. Sugarcane 1: 5-8.
5. Kilaru and Aruna (1998) Micropropagation of sugarcane - A commercial approach. Proc. 60th Annual Convention of Sugarcane Technologists Association of India. pp. 81-86.
6. Steenivasan TS and Sreenivasan J (1992) Micropropagation of sugarcane varieties for increasing cane yield. SISSTA Sugar. J. 18(4): 61-64.