Barriers to identifying substance abuse in the reformed welfare system

Social Service Review

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 217-238

  Henderson, Stuart ^a   Dohan, Daniel ^a   Schmidt, Laura A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745927161     PISSN: 00377961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/501491     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bartle, Elizabeth, and Gabriela Segura. 2003. "Welfare Policy, Welfare Participants, and CalWORKs Caseworkers: How Participants Are Informed of Supportive Services." Journal of Poverty 7 (1-2): 141-61.
2. Beckerman, Adela, and Leonard Fontana. 2001. "The Transition from AFDC to PRWORA in Florida: Perceptions of the Role of Case Manager in Welfare Reform." Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 28 (3): 29-47.
3. Brown, Rebecca. 2001. "Addressing Substance Abuse and Mental Health Problems under Welfare Reform: State Issues and Strategies." Issue Brief. National Governors Association, Center for Best Practices, Washington, DC.
4. Bush, Irene R., and M. Katherine Kraft. 2001. "Self-Sufficiency and Sobriety: Substance-Abusing Women and Welfare Reform." Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions 1 (1): 41-64.
5. California Department of Social Services. 2002a. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 01/02, July through September 2001. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
6. California Department of Social Services. 2002b. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 01/02, October through December 2001. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
7. California Department of Social Services. 2002c. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 01/02, January through March 2002. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
8. California Department of Social Services. 2002d. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 01/02, April through June 2002. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
9. California Department of Social Services. 2003a. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 02/03, July through September 2002. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
10. California Department of Social Services. 2003b. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 02/03, October through December 2002. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
11. California Department of Social Services. 2003c. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 02/03, January through March 2003. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
12. California Department of Social Services. 2003d. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 02/03, April through June 2003. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
13. California Department of Social Services. 2004a. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: Stateliscal Year 03/04, July through Septmnber 2003. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
14. California Department of Social Services. 2004b. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 03/04, October through December 2003. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
15. California Department of Social Services. 2004c. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 03/04, January through March 2004. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
16. California Department of Social Services. 2004d. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 03/04, April through June 2004. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
17. California Department of Social Services. 2005a. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 04/05, July through September 2004. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
18. California Department of Social Services. 2005b. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 04/05, October through December 2004. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
19. California Department of Social Services. 2005c. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 04/05, January through March 2005. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
20. California Department of Social Services. 2005d. Quarterly CalWORKs Report: State Fiscal Year 04/05, April through June 2005. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services, Research and Development Division, Data Systems and Survey Design Bureau.
21. Chandler, Daniel, Joan Meisel, Pat Jordan, Beth Menees Rienzi, and Sandra Naylor Goodwin. 2004. "Substance Abuse, Employment, and Welfare Tenure." Social Service Review 78 (4): 628-51.
22. DeLapp, Lynn. 2001. Connecting Different Worlds: Mental Health, Alcohol and Drug, and Family Violence Services in CalWORKs. California Research Bureau Report no. CRB-01-013. Sacramento: California State Library.
23. Dohan, Daniel, Laura A. Schmidt, and Stuart Henderson. 2005. "From Enabling to Boot-strapping: Welfare Workers' Views of Substance Abuse and Welfare Reform." Contemporary Drug Problems 32 (3): 429-55.
24. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Greenfield, Thomas K., and Constance Weisner. 1995. "Drinking Problems and Self-Reported Criminal Behavior, Arrests and Convictions: 1990 U.S. Alcohol and 1989 County Surveys." Addiction 90 (3): 361-73.
26. Hagen, Jan L., and Judith Owens-Manley. 2002. "Issues in Implementing TANF in New York: The Perspective of Frontline Workers." Social Work 47 (2): 171-82.
27. Jacobs, Laurie, Laura A. Schmidt, and James Wiley. 2003. "The Welfare System's New Response to Addiction and Mental Illness." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, San Francisco, November 15-19.
28. Jayakody, Rukmalie, Sheldon H. Danziger, and Harold A. Pollack. 2000. "Welfare Reform, Substance Use, and Mental Health." Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 25 (4): 623-51.
29. Katz, Michael B. 1989. The Undeserving Poor: From the War on Poverty to the War on Welfare. New York: Pantheon.
30. Kingfisher, Catherine P. 1998. "How Providers Make Policy: An Analysis of Everyday Conversation in a Welfare Office." Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 8 (2): 119-36.
31. Lee, Rufina, and Laura Curran. 2003. "Serving the 'Hard-to-Serve': The Use of Clinical Knowledge in Welfare Reform." Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 30 (3): 59-78.
32. Legal Action Center. 1999. "Steps to Success: Helping Women with Alcohol and Drug Problems Move from Welfare to Work." Report. Legal Action Center, Washington, DC.
33. Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.
34. Lofland, John, and Lyn H. Lofland. 1995. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
35. Matza, David. 1966. "The Disreputable Poor." 310-39 in Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Seymour Martin Lipset. Chicago: Aldine.
36. Meisel, Joan, Daniel Chandler, and Pat Jordan. 2001. "Six County Case Study: Moving beyond Implementation to Identification and Service." CalWORKs Project Report no. 2. California Institute for Mental Health, Sacramento.
37. Metsch, Lisa R., Clyde B. McCoy, Michael Miller, Heather McAnany, and Margaret Pereyra. 1999. "Moving Substance-Abusing Women from Welfare to Work." Journal of Public Health Policy 20 (1): 36-55.
38. Metsch, Lisa R., and Harold A. Pollack. 2005. "Welfare Reform and Substance Abuse." Milbank Quarterly 83 (1): 65-99.
39. Meyers, Marcia K., Bonnie Glaser, and Karin MacDonald. 1998. "On the Front Lines of Welfare Delivery: Are Workers Implementing Policy Reforms?" Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 (1): 1-22.
40. Montoya, Isaac D., John S. Atkinson, and Heidi M. Struse. 2001. "A Comparison of Psychosocial Barriers among Welfare Recipients: Implications for Drug Treatment." Substance Use and Misuse 36 (6-7): 771-88.
41. Morgenstern, Jon, Annette Riordan, Dominick Dephilippis, Thomas W. Irwin, Kimberly A. Blanchard, Barbara S. McCrady, and Katharine McVeigh. 2001. Specialized Screening Approaches Can Substantially Increase the Identification of Substance Abuse Problem among Weyare Recipients. Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
42. Nakashian, Mary R., and E. Ann Moore. 2001. ldentifying Substance Abuse among TANF-Eligible Families. Technical Assistance Publication Series no. 26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Publication no. SMA01-3530. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
43. Nathan, Richard P., and Thomas L. Gais. 1999. Implementing the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996: A First Look Albany: State University of New York, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
44. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse and American Public Human Services Association. 1999. "Building Bridges: States Respond to Substance Abuse and Welfare Reform." Report. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, New York.
45. Parish, David C. 1997. "Another Indication for Screening and Early Intervention: Problem Drinking." Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (13): 1079-80.
46. Pavetti, LaDonna. 2002. "Helping the Hard-to-Employ." 135-44 in Welfare Reform and Beyond: The Future of the Safety Net, edited by Isabel V. Sawhill, R. Kent Weaver, Ron Haskins, and Andrea Kane. Washington, DC: Brookings.
47. Pollack, Harold A., Sheldon H. Danziger, Kristin S. Seefeldt, and Rukmalie Jayakody. 2002. "Substance Use among Welfare Recipients: Trends and Policy Responses." Social Service Review 76 (2): 256-74.
48. Rapp, Lisa A., Catherine N. Dulmus, John S. Wodarski, and Marvin D. Feit. 1999. "Screening of Substance Abuse in Public Welfare and Child Protective Service Clients: A Comparative Study of Rapid Assessment Instruments vs. the SASSU" Journal of Addictive Diseases 18 (1): 83-88.
49. Rubinstein, Gwen. 2002, "The State of State Policy on TANF and Addiction: Findings from the 'Survey of State Policies and Practices to Address Alcohol and Drug Problems among TANF Recipients.'" Report, Legal Action Center, Washington, DC.
50. Schmidt, Laura A. 1990. "Problem Drinkers and the Welfare Bureaucracy." Social Service Review 64 (3): 390-406.
51. Schmidt, Laura A., Daniel Dohan, James Wiley, and Denise Zabkiewicz. 2002. "Addiction andWelfare Dependency: Interpreting the Connection." Social Problems 49 (2): 221-41.
52. Schmidt, Laura A., and Dennis McCarty. 2000. "Welfare Reform and the Changing Landscape of Substance Abuse Services for Low-Income Women." Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 24 (8): 1298-1311.
53. Schmidt, Laura A., James Wiley, Daniel Dohan, Denise Zabkiewicz, Laurie Jacobs, Stuart Henderson, and Matthew Zivot. Forthcoming. "Changing Patterns of Addiction and Public Aid Receipt: Tracking the Unintended Consequences of Welfare Reform Policy." Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law.
54. Thompson, Terri, and Kelly S. Mikelson. 2001. "Screening and Assessment in TANF/Welfare-to-Work: Ten Important Questions TANF Agencies and Their Partners Should Consider." Report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
55. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1992. Functional Impairments of AFDC Clients. Office of Evaluation and Inspections Report no. OEI-02-90-00401. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General.
56. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1994. Patterns of Substance Use and Substance-Retated Impairment among Participants in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program (AFDC). Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
57. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. "Change in TANF Caseloads: Total TANF Families and Recipients." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/news/stats/caseload.htm.
58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2001. "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families: Total Number of Families and Recipients, July-September 2000." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf. (Ihhs.gov/news/stats/welfare.htm.
59. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2002a. "Percent Change in TANF Families and Recipients, December 2001-June 2002." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf.dh.hs.gov/news /stats/percent_2002_rev.htm.
60. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2002b. "TANF: Average Monthly Number of Recipients: Fiscal Year 2001." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/stats/rccipientsL.htm.
61. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2002c. "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families: Total Number of Families and Recipients, January-March 2002." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf. dhhs.gov/news/stats/janr_mar2002_rev.htm.
62. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2002d. "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families: Total Number of Families and Recipients, April-June 2002." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf. hhs.gov/news/stats/apr_jun2002_rev.htm.
63. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2003a. "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families: Total Number of Families and Recipients, Percent Change from March 2002 to March 2003." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/news/stats/Mar02-Mar03.htm.
64. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2003b. "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families: Total Number of Families and Recipients, Percent Change from March 2003 to June 2003." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/news/press/2003/mar03_jun03.htm.
65. Weber, Max. 1978. "Bureaucracy." 956-1005 in Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 2. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
66. Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1999. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.