Perceptions of extension's desirable future and the role of IT

Journal of Extension

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 9-23

  Mitchell, Matthew ^a   Gillis, Bill ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745914232     PISSN: 10775315     EISSN: 10775315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bull, N.M., Cote, L.S., Warner, P.D., & McKinnie, M.R., (2004). Is Extension relevant for the 21st Century? Journal of Extension [On Line], 42(6). Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2004december/comm2.shtml
2. Domaingue, R. (1989). Community development through ethnographic futures research. Journal of Extension [On Line], 27 (2). Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/1989summer/fut1.html
3. Garibaldo, F. (2002). Information and communication technologies, organizations and skills: Convergence and persistence. AI & Society, 16(4), 305-331.
4. McDowell, G. (2004). Is Extension an idea whose time has come- and gone? Journal of Extension [On Line], 42(6). Available at:_ http://www.joe.orq/joe/ 2004december/comm1.shtml
5. Peters, S.J. (2002). Rousing the people on the land: The roots of the educational organizing Tradition in Extension work. Journal of Extension [On Line], 40(3). Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2002june/a1.html
6. Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
7. Textor, R. (1990). "Methodological appendix" in S. Ketudat's The middle path for the future of Thailand: Technology in harmony with culture and environment. Honolulu: Institute for Culture and Communication, East-West Center, xxii-xlv.