Phase field models and higher-order active contours

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn II, Issue , 2005, Pages 970-976

  Rochery, Marie ^a   Jermyn, Ian ^a   Zerubia, Josiane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE NETWORKS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FUNCTION EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ACTIVE CONTOURS; CONTOUR ENERGIES; NONLOCAL INTERACTIONS; PHASE FIELD MODELS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 33745910877     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2005.189     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. S. M. Allen and J. W. Cahn. A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsing. Acta Metallurgica, 27:1085-1095, 1979.
2. G. Aubert, J. E Aujol, and L. Blanc-Féraud. Detecting codimension-two objects in an image with Ginzburg-Landau models. Research Report 5254, INRIA, July 2004.
3. D. Cremers, S. Osher, and S. Soatto. Kernel density estimation and intrinsic alignment for knowledge-driven segmentation: Teaching level sets to walk. In P roc. Patt. Rec., volume 3175 of LNCS, pages 36-44. Springer, 2004.
4. D. Cremers, N. Sochen, and C. Schnörr. Multiphase dynamic labeling for variational recognition-driven image segmentation. In Proc. ECCV, volume 3024 of LNCS, pages 74-86. Springer, 2004.
5. H. Grossauer and O. Scherzer. Using the complex GinzburgLandau equation for digital inpainting in 2D and 3D. In P roc. Scale-Space, volume 2695 of LNCS, pages 225-236. Springer, 2003.
6. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. IJCV, 1(4):321-331, 1988.
7. S. A. Langer, R. E. Goldstein, and D. P. Jackson. Dynamics of labyrinthine pattern formation in magnetic fluids. Phys. Rev. A, 46(8):4894-4904, 1992.
8. S. Osher and N. Paragios, editors. Geometric Level Set Methods in Imaging, Vision, and Graphics. Springer, New York, 2003.
9. S. Osher and J. A. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J. Comp. Phys., 79:12-49, 1988.
10. C. B. Price, P. Wambacq, and A. Oosterlinck. Image enhancement and analysis with reaction-diffusion paradigm. IEE Proceedings I, 137(3): 136-145, June 1990.
11. M. Rochery, I. H. Jermyn, and J. Zerubia. Higher order active contours and their application to the detection of line networks in satellite imagery. In P roc. VLSM, at ICCV, Nice, France, Oct. 2003.
12. M. Rochery, I. H. Jermyn, and J. Zerubia. Gap closure in (road) networks using higher-order active contours. In Proc. ICIP, Singapore, Oct. 2004.
13. M. Rochery, I. H. Jermyn, and J. Zerubia. New higher-order active contour energies for network extraction. In Proc. ICIP, Genova, Italy, Sept. 2005.
14. C. Samson, L. Blanc-Féraud, G. Aubert, and J. Zerubia. A variational model for image classification and restoration. Trans. PAMI, 22(5):460-472, May 2000.
15. G. Turk. Generating textures on arbitrary surfaces using reaction-diffusion. Comp. Graph., 25(3), July 1991.
16. A. Witkin and M. Kass. Reaction-diffusion textures. Comp. Graph., 25(3), July 1991.
17. S. C. Zhu and D. Mumford. Prior learning and Gibbs reaction-diffusion. Trans. PAMI, 19(11):1236-1250, Nov. 1997.
18. S. C. Zhu and A. Yuille. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, and Bayes/MDL for multi-band image segmentation. Trans. PAMI, 18(9):884-900, 1996.