Correlation of carotid stenosis diameter and cross-sectional areas with CT angiography

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 638-642

  Bartlett, E S ^a   Symons, S P ^b   Fox, A J ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPARATUS; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CAROTID STENOSIS; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33745909924     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993;186:316-18
2. Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons S, et al. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13-19
3. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patient with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-53
4. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235-43
5. Eliasziw M, Smith RF, Singh N, et al. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 1994;25:2445-49.
6. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomized controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107-16
7. Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PS, et al. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:3047-52
8. Young GR, Humphrey PRD, Nixon TE, et al. Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction angiography and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis. Stroke 1996;27:467-73
9. Anderson GB, Ashforth R, Steinke DE, et al. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease. Stroke 2000;31:2168-74.
10. Leclerc X, Godefroy O, Pruvo J, et al. Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1995;26:1577-82
11. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179-85
12. Chen CJ, Lee TH, Hsu HL, et al. Multi-slice CT angiography in diagnosing total versus near occlusions of the internal carotid artery: comparison with catheter angiography. Stroke 2004;35:83-85
13. Koelemay MJW, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, et al. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 2004;35:2306-12
14. Porsche C, Walker L, Mendelow D, et al. Evaluation of cross-sectional luminal morphology in carotid atherosclerotic disease by use of spiral CT angiography. Stroke 2001;32:2511-15
15. Dix J, Evans A, Kallmes D, et al. Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:409-15
16. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, et al. Contrast enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:213-19
17. Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT. Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1996;27:695-99
18. Lee VS, Hertzberg BS, Workman MJ, et al. Variability of Doppler US measurements along the common carotid artery, effects on estimates of internal carotid arterial stenosis in patients with angiographically proved disease. Radiology 2000;214:387-92
19. Qureshi AI, Suri MFK, Ali Z, et al. Role of conventional angiography in evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis demonstrated by Doppler ultrsound in general practice. Stroke 2001;32:2287-91
20. Napoli A, Fleischmann D, Chan FP, et al. Computed tomography angiography. state-of-the-art imaging using multidetector-row technology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(suppl 1):S32-45