Functional skin testing: the SMART procedures

Irritant Dermatitis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 211-221

  John, Swen Malte ^a   Schwanitz, Hans J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745908037     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31294-3_25     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Agner T. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. Acta Derm Venereol, Suppl 1992; 173:1-26
2. Bangha E, Hinnen U, Elsner P. Irritancy testing in occupational dermatology: comparison between two quick tests and the acute irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulphate. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1996; 76:450-452
3. Basketter DA, Miettinen J, Lahti A. Acute irritant reactivity in atopics and non-Atopics. Contact Derm 1998; 38:253-256
4. Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Elsner P. Is occupational irritant contact dermatitis predictable by cutaneous bioengineering methods? Results of the Swiss metalworkers eczema study (PROMETES). Dermatology 1999; 198:351-354
5. Björnberg A (1968) Skin reactions to primary irritants in patients with hand eczema. Göteburg, Isaacsons
6. Björnberg A (1974) Low alkali resistance and slow alkali neutralization. Characteristics of the eczematous subject? Dermatol 149:90-100
7. Brandenburg S, Schwanitz HJ, John SM (1999) Empfehlungen für die Begutachtung von Berufskrankheiten nach BK 5101. Dermatosen 47:109-114
8. Bryld LE, Agner T, Kyvik KO, Brondsted L, Hindsberger C, Menné T. Hand eczema in twins: a questionnaire investigation. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142:298-305
9. Burckhardt W. Neue Untersuchungen über die Alkaliempfindlichkeit der Haut. Dermatologica 1947; 94:8-96
10. Burckhardt W. Praktische und theoretische Bedeutung der Alkalineutralisations- und Alkaliresistenzproben. Arch Klin Derm 1964; 219:600-603
11. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20:37-46
12. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1988
13. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br J Dermatol 1990; 123:607-613
14. Czernielewski A. L'importance pratique du test de résistance de la peau à l'action des alcalis. In: Symp Dermatol Pragae cum participatione internationali de morbis cutaneis professionalibus, Prag 1960. 1962; Exerpta Lectionum, pp 84-85
15. Den Arend JA, de Haan AFJ, Malten KE. Seasonal transepidermal water loss and impedance of forearm skin in atopics and non-Atopics. Contact Derm 1988; 19:376-390
16. Frosch PJ. Hautirritation und empfindliche Haut. Grosse Verlag, Berlin, 1985
17. Frosch PJ. Clinical Aspects of Irritant Contact Dermatitis. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2001; pp 313-354
18. Frosch PJ, Pilz B. Irritant patch test techniques. In: Serup J, Jemec GBE (eds) Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin. CRC press, Boca Raton, 1995; pp 587-591
19. Gloor M, Schnyder UW. Vererbung funktioneller Eigenschaften der Haut. Hautarzt 1977; 28:231-234
20. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics, revised edn. Huntington, New York, 1974
21. Holst R, Möller H. One hundred twin pairs patch tested with primary irritants. Br J Dermatol 1975; 93:145-149
22. Iliev D, Hinnen U, Elsner P. Reproducibility of a non-invasive skin irritancy test in a cohort of metalworker trainees. Contact Derm 1997; 36:101-103
23. John SM. Klinische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Diagnostik in der Berufsdermatologie. Konzeption einer wissenschaftlich begründeten Qualitätssicherung in der sozialmedizinischen Begutachtung. In: Schwanitz HJ (ed) Studien zur Prävention in Allergologie, Berufs- und Umweltdermatologie (ABU 4). Universitätsverlag Rasch, Osnabrück, 2001
24. Kolbe L, Kligman AM, Stoudemayer T. The sodium hydroxide erosion assay: a revision of the alkali resistance test. Arch Derm Res 1998; 290:382-387
25. Lange N, Weinstock MA. Statistical analysis of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a diagnostic test. In: Serup J, Jemec GBE (eds) Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin. CRC press, Boca Raton, 1995; pp 33-41
26. Locher G. Permeabilitätsprüfung der Haut Ekzemkranker und Hautgesunder für den neuen Indikator Nitrazingelb "Geigy", Modizifierung der Alkaliresistenzprobe, pH-Verlauf in der Tiefe des stratum corneum. Dermatologica 1962; 124:159-182
27. Löffler H, Effendy I, Happle R. Epikutane Testung mit Natriumlaurylsulfat. Nutzen und Grenzen in Forschung und Praxis. Hautarzt 1999; 50:769-778
28. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 22:164-178
29. Schultheiss E. Eigenuntersuchungen und Alkaliresistenzprobe. Arch Klin Exp Dermatol 1964; 219:638-648
30. Schulz D, Korting GW. Zur weiteren Kenntnis der Alkaliresistenz-Probe. Dermatosen 1987; 35:91-94
31. Schwanitz HJ. Atopic palmoplantar eczema. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1988
32. Spruit D, Malten KE. Injury to the skin by alkali and its regeneration. Dermatologica 1966; 132:124-130
33. Spruit D, Malten KE. Estimation of the injury of human skin by alkaline liquids. Berufsdermatosen 1968; 16:11-24
34. Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. Susceptibility to irritants: role of barrier function, skin dryness and history of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1990; 123:199-205
35. Tupker RA, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee CH, Fartasch M, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the standardization group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Derm 1997; 37:53-69
36. Ummenhofer B. Zur Methodik der Alkaliresistenzprüfung. Dermatosen 1980; 28:104-109
37. Wacek A. Weitere Untersuchungen aus dem Gebiet der Alkali- und Säureabwehr der Haut, Dermatologica 1953; 107:369-417
38. Wahlberg JE. Patch testing. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2001; pp 435-468
39. Wilhelm KP, Pasche F, Surber C, Maibach HI. Sodium hydroxide-induced subclinical irritation. A test for evaluating stratum corneum barrier function. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1990; 70:463-467
40. Wilson D, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. In vivo transepidermal water loss and skin surface hydration in association of moisturization and soap effects. Int J Cosm Sci 1988; 10:201-211