Comparison of flexible grasping forceps and stone basket for removal of retracted ureteral stents

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 418-422

  Nagele, Udo ^a   Praetorius, Manuel ^a   Schilling, David ^a   Stenzl, Arnulf ^a   Anastasiadis, Aristotelis G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITINOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYSTOSCOPE; CYSTOSCOPY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FLEXIBLE GRASPING FORCEPS; FORCE; FORCEPS; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; STONE BASKET; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER STENT; URETEROSCOPE; URETEROSCOPY;

ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REOPERATION; STENTS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; URETER; URETERAL CALCULI; URETEROSCOPES; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 33745901942     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.418     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Kulkarni R. Metallic ureteric stents: The current situation. BJU Int 2003;92:188-189.
2. Poon M, Beaghler M, Baldwin D. Flexible endoscope deflectability: Changes using a variety of working instruments and laser fibers. J Endourol 1997;11:247-249.
3. Monga M, Anderson KJ, Durfee W. Physical properties of flexible ureteroscopes: Implications for clinical practice. J Endourol 2004;18:462-465.
4. Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, et al. Flexible ureteroscopes: A single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 2000;164:1164-1168.