|
Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 340-344
|
Does gel affect cytology or comfort in the screening papanicolaou smear?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
LUBRICATING AGENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
GEL;
GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN CELL;
LUBRICATION;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PAPANICOLAOU TEST;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SCREENING;
STUDENT T TEST;
UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LUBRICANTS;
MASS SCREENING;
UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;
VAGINAL CREAMS, FOAMS, AND JELLIES;
VAGINAL SMEARS;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 33745885972
PISSN: 15572625
EISSN: 15587118
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.4.340 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (25)
|
References (9)
|