Perception of risk and surveillance practices of women with a family history of breast cancer

Cancer Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 227-235

  Martin, Wanda ^a   Degner, Lesley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Depression; Family history; Perceived risk

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDIES DEPRESSION SCALE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; FAMILIAL CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BELIEF MODEL; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST SELF EXAMINATION; BREAST TUMOR; CANADA; EDUCATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PEDIGREE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CARE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MANITOBA; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PEDIGREE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CARE; WOMEN;

EID: 33745882951     PISSN: 0162220X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200605000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Canadian Cancer Society. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2004. 2004. Available at: http://www.cancer.ca/vgn/images/portal/cit_86751114/14/33/ 195986411niw_stats2004_en.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2004.
2. Pharoah PDP, Day NE, Duffy S, Easton DF, Ponder BAJ. Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 1997;71(5):800-809.
3. Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC, et al. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(11):892-897.
4. Claus EB, Risch NJ, Thompson WD. Age at onset as an indicator of familial risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131(6):961-972.
5. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):676-689.
6. Lerman C, Croyle RT. Emotional and behavioural responses to genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer. Oncology. 1996;10(2):191-199.
7. Bredart A, Autier P, Audiso RA, et al. Psycho-social aspects of breast cancer susceptibility testing: a literature review. Eur J Cancer Care. 1998;7:174-180.
8. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. In: Becker MH, ed. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behaviour. Thorofare, NJ: Charles B. Slack; 1974:1-8.
9. Champion VL. Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health. 1999;22(4):341-348.
10. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1-47.
11. Cull A, Anderson EDC, Campbell S, et al. The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(3-4):501-508.
12. Frost MH, Vockley CW, Suman JJ, et al. Perceived familial risk of cancer: health concerns and psychosocial adjustment. J Psych Oncol. 2000;18(1):63-82.
13. Lloyd S, Watson M, Waites B, et al. Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:482-487.
14. Gagnon P, Massie MJ, Kash KM, et al. Perception of breast cancer risk and psychological distress in women attending a surveillance program. Psycho-Oncology. 1996;5:259-269.
15. Hopwood P, Shenton A, Lalloo F, et al. Risk perception and cancer worry: and exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer.J Med Genet. 2001;38:139-142.
16. Esplen MJ, Toner B, Hunter J, et al. A supportive-expressive group intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer: results of a phase II study. Psycho-Oncology. 2000;9:243-252.
17. Watson M, Lloyd S, Davidson J, et al. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(5/6):868-874.
18. Burke W, Culver JO, Bowen D, et al. Genetic counselling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer. Am J Med Genet. 2000;90:361-368.
19. Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(4):286-292.
20. Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, et al. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer: II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;227(12):997-1003.
21. de Bock GH, van Asperen CJ, de Vries JM, et al. How women with a family history of breast cancer and their general practitioners act on genetic advice in general practice: prospective longitudinal study. Br Med J. 2001;322:26-27.
22. Meiser B, Butow P, Barratt A, et al. Breast cancer screening uptake in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;59:101-111.
23. Drossaert CCH, Boer H, Seydel ER. Perceived risk, anxiety, mammogram uptake, and breast self-examination of women with a family history of breast cancer: the role of knowing to be at increased risk. Cancer Detect Prev. 1996;20(1):76-85.
24. Bastani R, Maxwell AE, Bradford C, et al. Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev Med. 1999;29:355-364.
25. Daly MB, Lerman CL, Ross E, et al. Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behaviour. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;41:59-70.
26. Lerman C, Kash K, Stefanek M. Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behaviour. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1994;16:171-176.
27. Royak-Schaler R, Klabunde CN, Greene WF, et al. Communicating breast cancer risk: patient perceptions of provider discussions. Available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/429553_print. Accessed April 1, 2002.
28. Hailey BJ, Carter CL, Burnett DR. Breast cancer attitudes, knowledge, and screening behaviour in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Health Care Women Int. 2000;21:701-715.
29. Duric V, Butow P, Sharpe L, et al. Reducing psychological distress in a genetic counselling consultation for breast cancer. J Genet Couns. 2003;12(3):243-264.
30. Grosfeld FJM, Lips CJM, Beemer FA, et al. Who is at risk for psychological distress in genetic testing programs for hereditary cancer disorders? J Genet Couns. 2000;9(3):253-266.
31. Hutson SP. Attitudes and psychological impact of genetic testing, genetic counseling, and breast cancer risk assessment among women at increased risk. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003;30(2):241-246.
32. Canadian Mental Health Association. Available at: http://www.cmha.ca/ english/research/effects_dep_anx_es.htm. Accessed August 27, 2003.
33. Murphy JM, Laird MM, Monson RR, et al. A 40-year perspective on the prevalence of depression: the Stirling county study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):209-215.
34. Remick R. Diagnosis and management of depression in primary care: a clinical update and review. Can Med Assoc J. 2002;167(11):1253-1260.
35. Butow PN, Lobb EA, Meiser B, et al. Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2003;178:77-81.
36. Keller PA, Lipkus IM, Rimer BK. Depressive realism and health risk accuracy: the negative consequences of positive mood. J Consum Res. 2002;29:57-69.
37. Lerman C, Hughes C, Lemon SJ, et al. What you don't know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(5):1650-1654.
38. Matthews AK, Brandenburg DL, Cummings S, et al. Incorporating a psychological counselor in a cancer risk assessment program: necessity, acceptability, and potential roles. J Genet Couns. 2002;11(1):51-65.
39. Wellisch DK, Hoffman A, Goldman S. Depression and anxiety symptoms in women at high risk for breast cancer: pilot study of a group intervention. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(10):1644-1645.
40. Wellisch DK, Lindberg NM. A psychological profile of depressed and nondepressed women at high risk for breast cancer. Psychosomatics. 2001;42(4):330-336.
41. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385-401.
42. Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsberg RW, et al. Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet. 2001;98:15-24.
43. Gil F, Mendez I, Sirgo A, et al. Perception of breast cancer risk and surveillance behaviours of women with family history of breast cancer: a brief report on a Spanish cohort. Psycho-Oncology. 2003;12:821-827.
44. Kash K, Holland JC, Osborne MP, et al. Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;17:73-83.
45. National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. Available at: http://bcra.nci.nih.gov/brc/q1.htm. Accessed April 27, 2004.
46. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81(24):1879-1886.
47. Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91(18):1541-1548.
48. Champion VL, Skinner CS. Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption. J Women's Health. 2003;12(3):277-286.
49. Decker KM, Harrison M, Schellenberg D. Manitoba Breast Screening Program 2002-2003 Statistical Report. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Breast Screening Program, CancerCare Manitoba; 2004.
50. Schwartz MD, Taylor KL, Willard KS, et al. Distress, personality, and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer. Health Psychol. 1999;18(4):327-332.
51. Chalmers K, Marles S, Tataryn D, et al. Reports of information and support needs of daughters and sisters of women with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2003;12(1):81-90.
52. Clark PC, Deaton C, Dunbar SB. Identifying possible depression in clinical research; ethical and outcome considerations for the investigator/clinician. Appl Nurs Res. 2003;16(1):53-59.
53. Sellick SM, Crooks SL. Depression and cancer: an appraisal of the literature for prevalence, detection, and practice guideline development for psychological interventions. Psycho-Oncology. 1999;8(4):315-333.
54. Beeber LS, Shea J, McCorkle R. The Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale as a measure of depressive symptoms in newly diagnosed patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1998;16(1):1-20.
55. Audrain-McGovern J, Hughes C, Patterson F. Effecting behaviour change: awareness of family history. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(2 SU):183-189.
56. Katapodi MC, Facione MC, Miaskowski C, et al. The influence of social support on breast cancer screening in a multicultural community sample. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29(5):845-852.
57. Culver J, Burke W, Yasui Y, et al. Participation in breast cancer genetic counselling: the influence of educational level, ethnic background, and risk perception. J Genet Couns. 2001;10(3):215-232.
58. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. News media coverage of screening mammography for women in the 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287(23):3136-3142.