Appearance modeling under geometric context

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn II, Issue , 2005, Pages 1252-1259

  Li, Jian ^a   Zhou, Shaohua Kevin ^b   Chellappa, Rama ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINGERPRINTING; GEOMETRIC TRANSFORM (GET); IMAGE WARPING; RADON TRANSFORMS;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; CONTOUR MEASUREMENT; DEFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; SET THEORY;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 33745877639     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Belongie et al. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. PAMI, 24(4):509-522, 2002.
2. V. Blanz and T. Vetter. Face recognition based on fitting a 3d morphable model. PAMI, 25(9), 2003.
3. T. Cootes and C. Taylor. Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging, 2001.
4. L. Ehrenpreis. The Universality of the Radon Transform. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003.
5. D. Forsyth and J. Ponce. Computer Vision, A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, 2003.
6. L. Gorelick et al. Shape representation and classification using the poisson equation. In CVPR, June 2004.
7. A. Jain. Fundamentals of digital image processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989.
8. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney. Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. Soc. of Industrial and Appl. Math., 2001.
9. M. Lades et al. Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 42:300-311, 1993.
10. H. Ling and D. Jacobs. Using the inner-distance for classification of articulated shapes. In CVPR, June 2005.
11. S. Osher and N. Paragios. Geometric Level Set Methods. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
12. M. Petrou and A. Kadyrov. Affine invariant features from the trace transform. PAMI, 26(1):30-44, 2004.
13. P. Phillips et al. The gait identification challenge problem: data sets and baseline algorithm. In ICPR, 2002.
14. T. Sebastian, P. Klein, and B. Kimia. Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs. PAMI, 26(5):550-571, 2004.
15. A. Tamrakar and B. Kimia. Medial visual fragments as an intermediate image representation for segmentation and perceptual grouping. In POCV, 2004.
16. R. Veltkamp and M. Hagedoorn. State-of-the-art in shape matching. Technical Report UU-CS-1999-27, 1999.
17. G. Wolberg. Digital Image Warping. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.