Assessing data quality and construct comparabilityin cross-national surveys

European Sociological Review

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 229-242

  Blasius, Jörg ^a   Thiessen, Victor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745875297     PISSN: 02667215     EISSN: 14682672     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/esr/jci054     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Benzécri, J.-P. et col. (1973). L'Analyse des Données. L'Analyse de Correspondence. Paris: Dunod.
2. Blasius, J. and Thiessen, V. (2001a). Methodological Artifacts in Measures of Political Efficacy and Trust. An Application of Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Political Analysis, 9, 1-20.
3. Blasius, J. and Thiessen, V. (2001b). The Use of Neutral Responses in Survey Questions: An Application of Multiple Correspondence Analyses. Journal of Official Statistics, 17, 351-367.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La Distinction. Critique Sociale du Judgement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
5. Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
6. Gower, J. C. and Hand, D. J. (1996). Biplots. London: Chapman & Hall.
7. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press.
8. Greenacre, M. J. (1993). Correspondence Analysis in Practice. London: Academic Press.
9. Greenacre, M. J. (2006). From simple to multiple correspondence analysis. In Greenacre, M. J. and Blasius, J. (Eds), Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall, pp. 39-74.
10. Harkness, J. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R. and Mohler, P. Ph. (Eds) (2003). Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11. Heiser, W. J. and Meulman, J. J. (1994). Homogeneity Analysis: Exploring the Distribution of Variables and their Nonlinear Relationships. In Greenacre, M. J. and Blasius, J. (Eds), Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. Recent Developments and Applications. London: Academic Press, pp. 179-209.
12. Herzberg, F. (1974). Workand theNature of Man. London: Crosby Lockwood Staples.
13. Kuechler, M. (1987). The Utility of Surveys for Cross-National Research. Social Science Research, 16, 229-244.
14. Linos, K. and West, M. (2003). Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution: Re-addressing the Issue of Cross-national Variation. European Sociological Review, 19, 393-409.
15. Moors, G. (2004). Facts and Artefacts in the Comparison of Attitudes Among Ethnic Minorities. A Multigroup Latent Class Structure Model with Adjustment for Response Style Behavior. European Sociological Review, 20, 303-320.
16. Saris, W. E. (1988). Variation in Response Functions: A Source of Measurement Error in Attitude Research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
17. Scheuch, E. K. (2000). The Use of ISSP for Comparative Research. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 47, 64-74.
18. SPSS Inc. [Meulman, J. J. and Heiser, W. J.] (1999). SPSS Categories 10.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
19. Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2003a). Bias and Equivalence: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. In Harkness, J. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R. and Mohler, P. Ph. (Eds), Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 143-155.
20. Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2003b). Bias and Substantive Analyses. In Harkness, J. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R. and Mohler, P. Ph. (Eds), Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 207-233.
21. Van Rijckevorsel, J. (1987). The Application of Fuzzy Coding and Horseshoes in Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Leiden: DSWO Press.