Front pattern of invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: New prognostic factor for predicting risk of lymph node metastases

Urology

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 148-153

  Guimarães, Gustavo Cardoso ^a   Lopes, Ademar ^a   Campos, Rodrigo Sousa Madeira ^a   de Cássio Zequi, Stenio ^a   de Oliveira Leal, Marcos Lima ^a   Carvalho, André Lopes ^a   da Cunha, Isabela Werneck ^a   Soares, Fernando Augusto ^a  

^a A C CAMARGO CANCER CENTER   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BLOOD VESSEL PERMEABILITY; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; CELL INFILTRATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOUTH CARCINOMA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; PENIS AMPUTATION; PENIS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; STATISTICAL MODEL; TUMOR CELL; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PENILE NEOPLASMS; PENIS; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 33745872968     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.050     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gloeckler-Reis LA, Hankey BF, and Edwards BK: Cancer Statistic Review 1973-1987. Publication No. 90-2789. Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, 1990.
2. Beggs J.H., and Spratt Jr. J.S. Epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 91 (1964) 166-172
3. Puras A., Gonzales-Flores B., and Rodrigues R. Treatment of carcinoma of the penis. Proc Kimbrough Urol Semin 12 (1978) 143-152
4. Staubitz W.J., Melborne H.L., and Oberkircher O.J. Carcinoma of the penis. Cancer 8 (1955) 371-378
5. Wajsman Z., Moure R.H., Merrin C.E., et al. Surgical treatment of penile carcinoma. a follow-up report. Cancer 40 (1977) 1697-1699
6. Narayama A.S., Olney L.E., Loening A.S., et al. Carcinoma of the penis. analysis of 219 cases. Cancer 49 (1982) 2185-2191
7. Young M.D., Reda D.J., and Walters W.B. Penile carcinoma. a twenty-five years' experience. Urology 38 (1991) 529-532
8. Kamat M.R., Kulkarni J.N., and Tongaonkar H.B. Carcinoma of the penis. the Indian experience. J Surg Oncol 52 (1993) 50-55
9. Horenblas S., Van Tinteren H., Delemarre J.F.M., et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. III. Treatment of regional lymph nodes. J Urol 149 (1993) 492-497
10. Ornellas A.U., Seixas A.L.C., Marota A., et al. Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151 (1994) 1244-1249
11. Lopes A., Hildago G.S., Kowalski L.P., et al. Prognostic factors in carcinoma of penis. multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 156 (1996) 1637-1642
12. Catalona W.J. Role of lymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the penis. Urol Clin North Am 7 (1980) 785-792
13. Sufrin G., and Huben R. Benign and malignant lesions of the penis. In: Gillewnateer J.Y. (Ed). Adult and Pediatric Urology. 2nd ed (1987), Year Book Medical, Chicago 1462-1463
14. Lopes A., Rossi B.M., Fonseca F.P., et al. Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinoma. Cancer 77 (1996) 2099-2102
15. Cabanas R.M. An approach for the treatment of the penile carcinoma. Cancer 39 (1977) 456-466
16. Horenblas S., Jansen L., Meinhardt W., et al. Detection of occult metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis using a dynamic sentinel node procedure. J Urol 163 (2000) 1000-1004
17. Tanis P.J., Lont A.P., Meinhardt W., et al. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer. reliability of a staging technique. J Urol 168 (2002) 76-80
18. Kroon B.K., Horenblas S., Meinhardt W., et al. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma. evaluation of 10 years' experience. Eur Urol 47 (2005) 601-606
19. Lopes A., Bezerra A.L., Pinto C.A.L., et al. p53 as a new prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis in penile carcinoma. analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy. J Urol 168 (2002) 81-86
20. Anneroth G., Batsakis J., and Luna M. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Scand J Dent Res 95 (1987) 229-249
21. Bryne M., Koppang H.S., Lilleng R., et al. New malignance grading is a better prognostic indicator than Broder's grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 18 (1989) 432-437
22. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Penis, in AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 6th ed (2002), Springer-Verlag, New York 331-336
23. Hall M.C., Sanders J.S., Vuitch F., et al. Deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry and traditional pathologic variables in invasive penile carcinoma assessment of prognostic significance. Urology 52 (1998) 11-16
24. Fraley E.E., Zhang G., Manivel C., et al. The role of ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy and significance of histological differentiation in treatment of carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 142 (1989) 1478-1482
25. Slaton J.W., Morgenstern N., Levy D.A., et al. Tumor stage, vascular invasion and the percentage of poorly differentiated cancer. independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol 156 (2001) 1138-1142
26. Srinivas V., Morse M.J., Herr H.W., et al. Penile cancer. relation of extent of metastasis to survival. J Urol 137 (1987) 880-882
27. Fraley E.E., Zhang G., Sazana R., et al. Cancer of the penis. prognosis and treatment plans. Cancer 55 (1985) 1618-1624
28. Solsona E., Iborra I., Ricos J.V., et al. Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 22 (1992) 115-118
29. Solsona E., Iborra I., Rubio J., et al. Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grades as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal nodes. J Urol 165 (2001) 1506-1509
30. Horenblas S., Van Tinteren H., Delemarre J.F.M., et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. accuracy of the Tumors, Nodes and Metastasis classification system, and role of lymphangiography, computerized tomography scan and fine needle aspiration cytology. J Urol 146 (1991) 1279-1283
31. Horenblas S., and Van Tinteren H. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival: analysis of Tumor, Nodes and Metastasis classification system. J Urol 151 (1994) 1239-1243