Erratum: MRA of abdominal vessels: Technical advances (European Radiology (2006) 10.1007/s00330-006-0240-3);MRA of abdominal vessels: Technical advances

European Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1637-1650

  Michaely, Henrik J ^a   Dietrich, Olaf ^a   Nael, Kambiz ^b   Weckbach, Sabine ^a   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Abdominal aorta; GRAPPA; High spatial resolution; Magnetic resonance angiography; Mesenteric arteries; Parallel imaging; Portal vein; Renal artery; SENSE; Technical developments; View sharing

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOBUTROL; GADOFOSVESET; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE;

ABDOMINAL ANGIOGRAPHY; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; AORTOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM EXTRAVASATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY BLOOD FLOW; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 33745867559     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0351-x     Document Type: Erratum

References (70)

1. Vosshenrich R, Fischer U (2002) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of abdominal vessels: Is there still a role for angiography? Eur Radiol 12:218-230
2. Bongartz GM, Boos M, Winter K et al (1997) Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 7[Suppl 5]:178-186
3. Nael K, Laub G, Finn JP (2005) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoraco-abdominal vessels. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13:359-380
4. Therasse E, Soulez G, Roy P et al (1998) Lower extremity: Nonstepping digital angiography with photostimulable imaging plates versus conventional angiography. Radiology 207:695-703
5. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG et al (2004) Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 141:674-682
6. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA (1998) Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1228-1235
7. Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MN et al (2000) Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 18:13-22
8. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH et al (2005) High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology 235:687-698
9. Ota H, Takase K, Rikimaru H et al (2005) Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. Radiographics 25:1141-1158
10. Vasbinder GBC, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ et al (2002) Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:685-696
11. Born M, Willinek WA, Gieseke J et al (2005) Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the abdominal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:559-565
12. Michaely HJ, Herrmann KA, Kramer EL et al (2006) High-resolution renal MRA: Comparison of image quality and vessel depiction with different parallel imaging acceleration factors. J Magn Reson Imaging (in press)
13. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV et al (1999) Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology 211:667-679
14. Campeau NG, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, Lin C, Gibbs GF (2001) Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: Initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 12:183-204
15. Lin W, An H, Chen Y et al (2003) Practical consideration for 3T imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 11:615-639, vi
16. Schmitt F, Grosu D, Mohr C et al (2004) 3 Tesla MRI: Successful results with higher field strengths. Radiologe 44:31-47
17. Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 40:715-724
18. Kramer H, Schoenberg SO, Nikolaou K et al (2005) Cardiovascular screening with parallel imaging techniques and a whole-body MR imager. Radiology 236:300-310
19. Hardy CJ, Darrow RD, Saranathan M et al (2004) Large field-of-view real-time MRI with a 32-channel system. Magn Reson Med 52:878-884
20. Fenchel M, Requardt M, Tomaschko K et al (2005) Whole-body MR angiography using a novel 32-receiving-channel MR system with surface coil technology: First clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:596-603
21. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952-962
22. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al (2002) Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 47:1202-1210
23. Griswold MA, Kannengiesser S, Heidemann RM, Wang J, Jakob PM (2004) Field-of-view limitations in parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 52:1118-1126
24. Goldfarb JW (2004) The SENSE ghost: Field-of-view restrictions for SENSE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:1046-1051
25. Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Muller M et al (2004) Feasibilities and limitations of high field parallel MRI. Radiologe 44:49-55
26. Wu Y, Goodrich KC, Buswell HR, Katzman GL, Parker DL (2004) High-resolution time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA by combining SENSE with keyhole and SLAM strategies. Magn Reson Imaging 22:1161-1168
27. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A et al (2000) Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:671-677
28. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO et al (2005) The feasibility of spatial high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the renal arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 177:800-804
29. Chen Q, Quijano CV, Mai VM et al (2004) On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging. Radiology 231:893-899
30. Herrmann KA, Dietrich O, Michaely HJ et al (2006) Magnetic Resonance Enteroclysis of small bowel disease: Value of single-breath-hold high resolution 3D TrueFISP imaging using two-dimensional parallel acquisition techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging (in press)
31. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O et al (2005) Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med 54:748-754
32. Dobritz M, Radkow T, Nittka M, Bautz W, Fellner FA (2002) VIBE with parallel acquisition technique - a novel approach to dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver. Rofo 174:738-741
33. Vogt FM, Antoch G, Hunold P et al (2005) Parallel acquisition techniques for accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen: Assessment of image quality and lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:376-382
34. McKenzie CA, Lim D, Ransil BJ et al (2004) Shortening MR image acquisition time for volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination with a recently developed parallel imaging reconstruction technique: clinical feasibility. Radiology 230:589-594
35. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G et al (1999) Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 212:876-884
36. Lee VS, Lavelle MT, Rofsky NM et al (2000) Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: Feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality. Radiology 215:365-372
37. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P et al (2001) Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol 36:283-291
38. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA (1996) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 36:345-351
39. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R et al (2005) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 40:40-48
40. Huston J 3rd, Fain SB, Riederer SJ et al (1999) Carotid arteries: maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. Radiology 211:265-273
41. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ (2001) High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 218:481-490
42. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R et al (2002) Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: Initial experience. Radiology 225:583-588
43. Butz B, Dorenbeck U, Borisch I et al (2004) High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. Acta Radiol 45:164-170
44. Wikstrom J, Johansson L, Karacagil S, Ahlstrom H (2003) The importance of adjusting for differences in proximal and distal contrast bolus arrival times in contrast-enhanced iliac artery magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 13:957-963
45. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL (1997) Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 203:275-280
46. Kirchin MA, Pirovano GP, Spinazzi A (1998) Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). An overview. Invest Radiol 33:798-809
47. Herborn CU, Lauenstein TC, Ruehm SG et al (2003) Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 38:27-33
48. Goyen M, Debatin JF (2003) Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) for magnetic resonance angiography: Review of the literature. Eur Radiol 13[Suppl 3]:N19-N27
49. Huppertz A, Rohrer M (2004) Gadobutrol, a highly concentrated MR-imaging contrast agent: Its physicochemical characteristics and the basis for its use in contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol 14[Suppl 5]:M12-M18
50. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Vogt FM et al (2003) Using a 1 M Gd-chelate (gadobutrol) for total-body three-dimensional MR angiography: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:565-571
51. Tombach B, Heindel W (2002) Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: Review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 12:1550-1556
52. Mohrs OK, Oberholzer K, Krummenauer F et al (2004) Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0 T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Rofo 176:985-991
53. Fink C, Puderbach M, Ley S et al (2005) Intraindividual comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine for time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the upper torso. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:286-290
54. Tombach B, Benner T, Reimer P et al (2003) Do highly concentrated gadolinium chelates improve MR brain perfusion imaging? Intraindividually controlled randomized crossover concentration comparison study of 0.5 versus 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol. Radiology 226:880-888
55. Gadofosveset (2004) MS 325, MS 32520, Vasovist, ZK 236018. Drugs R D 5:339-342
56. Goyen M, Edelman M, Perreault P et al (2005) MR angiography of aortoiliac occlusive disease: A phase III study of the safety and effectiveness of the blood-pool contrast agent MS-325. Radiology 236:825-833
57. Sharafuddin MJ, Stolpen AH, Dang YM, Andresen KJ, Roh BS (2002) Comparison of MS-325- and gadodiamide-enhanced MR venography of iliocaval veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1021-1027
58. Wehrschuetz M, Aschauer M, Portugaller H et al (2004) Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:441-446
59. Fink C, Hallscheidt PJ, Hosch WP et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors: Value of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography and comparison of three rendering algorithms. Eur Radiol 13:794-801
60. Mallouhi A, Schocke M, Judmaier W et al (2002) 3D MR angiography of renal arteries: Comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology 223:509-516
61. Baskaran V, Pereles FS, Nemcek AA Jr et al (2002) Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: A pilot comparison of maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reformatting, and 3D volume-rendering postprocessing algorithms. Acad Radiol 9:50-59
62. Mallouhi A, Chemelli A, Judmaier W et al (2002) Investigation of cerebrovascular disease with MR angiography: Comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms-initial assessment. Neuroradiology 44:961-967
63. Lee VS, Morgan JN, Tan AG et al (2003) Celiac artery compression by the median arcuate ligament: A pitfall of end-expiratory MR imaging. Radiology 228:437-442
64. Lauenstein TC, Ajaj W, Narin B et al (2005) MR Imaging of apparent small-bowel perfusion for diagnosing mesenteric ischemia: Feasibility study. Radiology 234:569-575, Feb
65. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG et al (2001) Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 135:401-411
66. Nastri MV, Baptista LP, Baroni RH et al (2004) Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of Takayasu arteritis. Radiographics 24:773-786
67. Kissin EY, Merkel PA (2004) Diagnostic imaging in Takayasu arteritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 16:31-37
68. Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Oesingmann N et al (2006) Functional assessment of Renal Artery Stenosis using dynamic MR perfusion measurements - feasibility. Radiology 238:586-596
69. Finn JP, Baskaran V, Carr JC et al (2002) Thorax: Low-dose contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with subsecond temporal resolution-initial results. Radiology 224:896-904
70. Pereles FS, McCarthy RM, Baskaran V et al (2002) Thoracic aortic dissection and aneurysm: evaluation with nonenhanced true FISP MR angiography in less than 4 minutes. Radiology 223:270-274