Orientational correlations in the glacial state of triphenyl phosphite

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 110, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 9747-9750

  Mei, Q ^a,c   Siewenie, J E ^a   Benmore, C J ^a,b   Ghalsasi, P ^c   Yargen, J L ^c  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN BONDS; MOLECULAR ORIENTATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ANTIPARALLEL CONFIGURATION; HEXAGONAL CRYSTALS; HEXAMER ARRANGEMENT; TRIPHENYL PHOSPHITE;

PHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS;

EID: 33745852613     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp060692z     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ha, A.; Cohen, I.; Zhao, X.; Lee, M.; Kivelson, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 1.
2. Tanaka, H.; Kurita, R.; Mataki, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 25701.
3. Kivelson, S. A.; Zhao, X.; Kivelson, D.; Fischer, T. M.; Knobler, C. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 2391.
4. Kivelson, D.; Kivelson, S. A.; Zhao, X.; Nussinov, Z.; Tarjus, G. Physica A 1995, 219, 27.
5. Cohen, I.; Ha, A.; Zhao, X.; Lee, M.; Fischer, T.; Strouse, M. J.; Kivelson, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 8518.
6. Kivelson, D.; Tarjus, G. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2002, 307-310, 630-636.
7. Senker, J.; Lüdecke, J. Z. Naturforsch., B 2001, 56, 1089.
8. Hedoux, A.; Dore, J.; Guinet, Y.; Bellissent-Funel, M. C.; Prevost, D.; Descamps, M.; Grandjean, D. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 5644-5648.
9. Guinet, Y.; Denicourt, T.; Hedoux, A.; Descamps, M. J. Mol, Struct. 2003, 651-653, 507.
10. Hedoux, A.; Guinet, Y.; Descamps, M. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 31.
11. Hedoux, A.; Hernandez, O.; Lefebvre, J.; Guinet, Y.; Descamps, M. Phys. Rev. B. 1999, 60, 9390.
12. Hedoux, A.; Guinet, Y.; Foulon, M.; Descamps, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 9374.
13. Derollez, P.; Hemandez, O.; Hedoux, A.; Guinet, Y.; Masson, O.; Lefebvre, J.; Descamps, A. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 694, 131-138.
14. Hedoux, A.; Guinet, Y.; Derollez, P.; Hernandez, O.; Lefort, R.; Descamps, M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 3192-3199.
15. Kurita, R.; Tanaka, H. Science 2004, 306, 845-848.
16. Senker, J.; Sehnert, J.; Correll, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 337.
17. Schwickert, B. E.; Kline, S. R.; Zimmermann, H.; Lantzky, K. M.; Yarger, J. L. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 45410.
18. Johari, G. P.; Ferrari, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10191.
19. Senker, J.; Rossler, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7592.
20. Mizukami, M.; Kobashi, K.; Hanaya, M.; Oguni, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4078.
21. McGreevy, R. L. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2001, 13, R877-R913.
22. Mei, Q.; Ghalsasi, P.; Benmore, C.; Yarger, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 20076.
23. 14 so neutron and X-ray data were both taken at 220 K after 4 h to minimize any structural variations between experiments.
24. Golovanov, D.; Lyssenko, K.; Antipin, M.; Vygodskii, Y.; Lozinskaya, E. CrystEngComm 2005, 7, 465-468.
25. Soper, A. K. Mol. Phys. 2001, 99, 1503.
26. If the phenyl rings were kept too rigid, the simulation became stuck in local minima. Also, because of the large number of coordination constraints, the number of molecules which could be included in the model was limited, so that the simulation would converge in a reasonable time frame.
27. Lorch, E. A. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1969, 2, 229.
28. Soper, A. K.; Luzar, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 1320.
29. Narten, A. H.; Levy, H. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 2263.