Gel and porous polyethylene implants in the rabbit anophthalmic cavity;Implantes de polietileno gel e poroso em cavidade anoftálmica de coelhos

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 305-308

  Ferraz, Lucieni Cristina Barbarini ^a   Schellini, Silvana Artioli ^a   Wludarski, Sheila Lordelo ^b   Padovani, Carlos Roberto ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b Consultoria em Patologia ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Orbital implants methods; Polyethylenes therapeutic use; Rabbits surgery; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANOPHTHALMIA; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; ECHOOCULOGRAPHY; ENUCLEATION; GEL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; ORBIT; ORBIT IMPLANT; RABBIT; VASCULARIZATION;

EID: 33745848836     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: 16782925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492006000300004     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Karesh JW, Dresner SC. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anoplathalmic socket implant. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(10):1688-95; discussion 1695-6.
2. Shields CL, Shields JA, De Potter P. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant after enucleation. Experience with initial 100 consecutive cases. Arch Opthalmol. 1992;110(3):333-8.
3. Shields CL, Shields JA, De Potter P, Singh AD. Problems with the hydroxyapatite orbital implant: experience with 250 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol, 1994;78(9):702-6.
4. Schellini SA, Xavier AP, Hoyama E, Rossa R, Pellizon C, Marques ME, Padovani CR. Gelatinous polyethylene in the treatment of the anophthalmic cavity. Orbit. 2002;21(3):189-93.
5. Ainbinder DJ, Haik BG, Mazzoli RA. Anophthalmic socket and orbital implants. Role of CT and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;36(6):1133-47, xi.
6. De Potter P, Duprez T, Cosnard G. Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor). Ophthalmology. 2000;107(9):1656-60.
7. Flanders AE, De Potter P, Rao VM, Tom BM, Shields CL, Shields JA. MRI of orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Neuroradiology. 1996;38(3):273-7.
8. Yamamoto ES, Hoyama E, Schellini SA, Padovani CR. Avaliação ultra-sonográfica do implante orbitário em cavidade anoftalmica. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2001;60(9):637-42.
9. Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994.
10. Mawn LA, Jordan DR. Gilberg S. Proliferation of human fibroblasts in vitro after exposure to orbital implants. Can J Ophthalmol. 2001;36(5):245-51.
11. Rubin PA, Popham JK, Bilyk JR, Shore JW. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Opathal Plast Reoonstr Surg. 1994;10(2):96-103.
12. Schellini SA, Marques ME, Padovani CR, Taga EM, Rossa R. Comparison of synthetic hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants in eviscerated rabbit eyes. Ophdial Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19(2):136-9.
13. Murray TG, Cicciarelli NL, Croft BH, Garonzik S, Voigt M, Hernandez E. Design of a magnetically integrated microporous implant Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(9):1259-62.
14. Byrne SF, Green RL. Examination techniques for the orbit. In: Byrne SF, Green RL Ultrasound of the eye and the orbit. St Louis: Mosby; 2002. p.15-45;273-89.